[ Upstream commit 8a48c0a3360bf2bf4f40c980d0ec216e770e58ee ]
fs/dax.c uses copy_user_page() but ARC does not provide that interface,
resulting in a build error.
Provide copy_user_page() in <asm/page.h>.
../fs/dax.c: In function 'copy_cow_page_dax':
../fs/dax.c:702:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_user_page'; did you mean 'copy_to_user_page'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
#Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> # v1
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
#Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> # v2
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cef397038167ac15d085914493d6c86385773709 ]
Stefan Agner reported a bug when using zsram on 32-bit Arm machines
with RAM above the 4GB address boundary:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
pgd = a27bd01c
[00000000] *pgd=236a0003, *pmd=1ffa64003
Internal error: Oops: 207 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in: mdio_bcm_unimac(+) brcmfmac cfg80211 brcmutil raspberrypi_hwmon hci_uart crc32_arm_ce bcm2711_thermal phy_generic genet
CPU: 0 PID: 123 Comm: mkfs.ext4 Not tainted 5.9.6 #1
Hardware name: BCM2711
PC is at zs_map_object+0x94/0x338
LR is at zram_bvec_rw.constprop.0+0x330/0xa64
pc : [<c0602b38>] lr : [<c0bda6a0>] psr: 60000013
sp : e376bbe0 ip : 00000000 fp : c1e2921c
r10: 00000002 r9 : c1dda730 r8 : 00000000
r7 : e8ff7a00 r6 : 00000000 r5 : 02f9ffa0 r4 : e3710000
r3 : 000fdffe r2 : c1e0ce80 r1 : ebf979a0 r0 : 00000000
Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
Control: 30c5383d Table: 235c2a80 DAC: fffffffd
Process mkfs.ext4 (pid: 123, stack limit = 0x495a22e6)
Stack: (0xe376bbe0 to 0xe376c000)
As it turns out, zsram needs to know the maximum memory size, which
is defined in MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS when CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is set, or in
MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS on the x86 architecture.
The same problem will be hit on all 32-bit architectures that have a
physical address space larger than 4GB and happen to not enable sparsemem
and include asm/sparsemem.h from asm/pgtable.h.
After the initial discussion, I suggested just always defining
MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS whenever CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is
set, or provoking a build error otherwise. This addresses all
configurations that can currently have this runtime bug, but
leaves all other configurations unchanged.
I looked up the possible number of bits in source code and
datasheets, here is what I found:
- on ARC, CONFIG_ARC_HAS_PAE40 controls whether 32 or 40 bits are used
- on ARM, CONFIG_LPAE enables 40 bit addressing, without it we never
support more than 32 bits, even though supersections in theory allow
up to 40 bits as well.
- on MIPS, some MIPS32r1 or later chips support 36 bits, and MIPS32r5
XPA supports up to 60 bits in theory, but 40 bits are more than
anyone will ever ship
- On PowerPC, there are three different implementations of 36 bit
addressing, but 32-bit is used without CONFIG_PTE_64BIT
- On RISC-V, the normal page table format can support 34 bit
addressing. There is no highmem support on RISC-V, so anything
above 2GB is unused, but it might be useful to eventually support
CONFIG_ZRAM for high pages.
Fixes: 61989a80fb3a ("staging: zsmalloc: zsmalloc memory allocation library")
Fixes: 02390b87a945 ("mm/zsmalloc: Prepare to variable MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS")
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Tested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/bdfa44bf1c570b05d6c70898e2bbb0acf234ecdf.1604762181.git.stefan@agner.ch/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Randy Dunlap