diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/css/site.css b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/css/site.css
index b8053940..d75cc12f 100755
--- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/css/site.css
+++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/css/site.css
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ p.menu {
                          "left   content right";
     max-width: 90rem;
     margin-left: 1rem;
-    #  margin-right: auto;
+    /**  margin-right: auto; **/
 
 }
 
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ p.menu {
     margin: 4px 4px 0px 0px; 
     padding: 0px;
     background-color: #ffffff;    
-    #border: 1px solid #cccccc;
+    /** #border: 1px solid #cccccc; **/
     font-size: 80%;
 }
 
diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/log4shell.html b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/log4shell.html
index 0eb1cbfb..79df5863 100644
--- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/log4shell.html
+++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/log4shell.html
@@ -235,111 +235,6 @@
       <code>owner</code>. If possible, they should also be monitored
       against changes and unauthorized manipulation.</p>
       
-      <h3 class="doAnchor" name="prevalence">Prevalence of logging
-      frameworks</h3>
-
-      <p>As discussed above, while log4j 2.14 and earlier are
-      vulnerable to log4shell, log4j 1.x and logback are not.</p>
-
-      <p>At this stage, it might be useful mention the prevalence of
-      each logging library in order to put things into
-      perspective. Here are the relevant figures as found
-      in <a href="https://mvnrepository.com/">mvnrepository site</a>
-      on 2021-12-17. </p>
-
-      <table  class="bodyTable striped" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4">
-
-        <tr>
-          <th>Project</th>
-          <th>Category</th>
-          <th>group:artifact</th>
-          <th>usageCount</th>
-          <th>percentage</th>          
-        </tr>
-        <tr>
-          <td>SLF4J</td>
-          <td>API</td>
-          <td>org.slf4j:slf4j-api</td>
-          <td>52,247</td>
-          <td>69%</td>
-        </tr>
-        <tr>
-          <td>Commons-logging</td>
-          <td>API</td>
-          <td>commons-logging:commons-logging</td>
-          <td>10,412</td>
-          <td>14%</td>
-        </tr>
-        <tr>
-          <td>SLF4J</td>
-          <td>API</td>
-          <td>org.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j</td>
-          <td>7,546</td>
-          <td>10%</td>
-        </tr>
-
-        <tr>
-          <td>LOG4J2</td>
-          <td>API</td>
-          <td>org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api</td>
-          <td>5,226</td>
-          <td> 7%</td>
-        </tr>
-
-        <tr>
-          <td>Total</td>
-          <td>API </td>
-          <td>-</td>
-          <td>75,431 </td>
-          <td>100%</td>
-        </tr>
-        
-        
-      </table>
-      <table  class="bodyTable striped" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4">
-        <tr>
-          <th>Project</th>
-          <th>Category</th>
-          <th>group:artifact</th>
-          <th>usageCount</th>
-          <th>percentage</th>          
-        </tr>
-        
-        <tr>
-          <td>LOGBACK</td>
-          <td>implementation</td>          
-          <td>ch.qos.logback:logback-classic</td>
-          <td>21,770</td>
-          <td>48%</td>          
-        </tr>
-
-        <tr>
-          <td>LOG4J1</td>
-          <td>implementation</td>                    
-          <td>log4j:log4j</td>
-          <td>16,610</td>
-          <td>37%</td>                              
-        </tr>
-        <tr>
-          <td>LOG4J2</td>
-          <td>implementation</td>                    
-          <td>org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core</td>
-          <td>6,974</td>
-          <td>15%</td>
-        </tr>
-
-        <tr>
-          <td>Total</td>
-          <td>implementaion </td>
-          <td>-</td>
-          <td>45,174 </td>
-          <td>100%</td>
-        </tr>
-      </table>
-
-      <p>Notwithstanding its 48% prevalence overall (implementation),
-      no attacks have been reported against logback that we are aware
-      of.</p>
       
       <h3>Further reading</h3>