Also process expand macro input for rule hash,
so that changed query rules (like one in testlang) get into
RulesDiff and could be updated with Preamble processing.
Program Preamble consists of 2 parts: rules & Journal.
Preamble rules are no-input rules with rules for their required nodes.
Preamble journal is journal part with results of executing these rules.
Preamble is defined per-Query, because Journal differs for Queries.
Repository CacheHolder is used for storing them b/w sessions.
Rules are stored and retrievied with Memoizer.
Journal is stored as SessionToken in PreambleSet (map Query->SessionToken).
Add option to IncrementalSpec -- incrementality level (Preamble or Full).
Ensure the order of rules in the resulting plan follows the priorities
set forward by extends relationship b/w languages. So that even if
rule template tables are unrelated, they are still ordered according to
language extension graph.
Ensure the order of rule lists in the resulting plan is stable b/w invocations of
RulesPlanHandler.allPlans().
Ensure the order of aspects in AspectClique is stable b/w invocations
of buildClique().
Associate RuleTemplatesTable with Manifest, and Manifest with CoderulesAspect.
Tentatively rename RulesList (the runtime object) to RulesPlan,
RulesListTable to RulesPlanHandler.
Too many nodes get into tmpl application process, which is unnecessary.
Many of those nodes are required actually only for correctly tracking
changes to nodes with WatchingTypecheckingStrategy.
Now implicitly required only nodes which are mentioned inside
constraint arguments. In other cases user must require them explicitly.
Alter the way invalidated nodes are handled by UpdatesRecorder.
A set of "source" nodes is now maintained, which helps to
detect the appropriate input for a changed node.
Templates are applied only to "new" or "invalidated" nodes.
Rename TypeDependenciesNodeTracker to RelevantNodesMonitor and
have it the only implementation.
The "stub" implementation was never really used.
Simplify creation of and access to the monitor.
Make use of MutableLogical's feature to track usages count.
A logical with 1 or less usages can't be contained in
another term, so it's safe to skip unification in this case.
During template application memo can be used to store results
of a computation in the session. The memo will be automatically
cleared on an event that invalidates the caches.
IncrProgramSpec influencing program eval is built from two sources:
internal analysis results & typechecking options.
Providing spec builder instead of spec allows to combine these
sources later at program pipeline creation in TypecheckingService.
Commit accomodates to addition of IncrementalSpec.Enabled.Unsafe
Commit also simplifies ProgramAnalysis -related classes.
Renames BasicProgramAnalysis to PrincipalsAnalysis.
The flag "recursive" is passed down to ProgramFactory to control whether
the input nodes are to be walked recursively.
This flag is set to false when calculating a node's type in isolation.
Operations such as 'error' and 'warning' are available on input
node in templates and serve to report issues found during
template application, in contrast with those found during evaluation.
Drop recording of "suppressed exception" by CoderulesHelper.
Report failed program evaluation as info message.
Ensure traces are available for failed evaluations.
Fixes IncrClosureInference.changeFunctionalInterfaceParam test.
Temporary rules built as macro applications weren't computing hash
due to origin!=null condition. Also macro inputs weren't processed.
Stable hash for TypeVarSubstitution is defined because it's used in macro args.
In general, any classes used as constraint/predicate/macro args
must adhere to stable hashCode() contract: hash should change
if there're important changes that may influence typechecking result.
Otherwise there may be unnecessary incremental recomputations.
Relevant for MPSCR-62
DataFormPrinter is hardcoded to support _term and _subterm
hacks and present the terms in a readable way.
Memoizer is searched for an implementation of
NodePresentable, which helps with visualization of SNode
and SNodeReference.
Term constructor creates all features with default values where
not overridden. The default values for "value" and "child"
features are wildcards for now (TBD), the default value for
list feature is an empty list.
The rationale is that a rule's head defining term pattern with
a logical variable capturing list feature will not be matched
with a free logical variable. Thus, to avoid having to always
explicitly specify all term features, a term constructor that
is not a pattern must use the default values for non-overridden
features.
Match constraint is provided for use cases where the intention
is to pattern-match a term capturing features into logical
variables.
A term constructor in the right-hand side of match constraint
is a pattern, and all its non-overridden features are
to be defined as wildcards.
It's possible to activate constraints in macros, so they must be also handled.
Also restrict a bit principal rules analysis: consider only rules with template input.
It makes definition of principal constraint clearer:
principal constraint is a constraint that has at least one arg
of type node<> and passes to it ruleOrigin in at least one rule.
Such constraints are most likely meant to define relations
of nodes to terms, e.g. `typeOf` -- which is what we're interested in.
At the same time semantics of values inside terms is less defined.
TermFeatures are also untyped, and so complete analysis of
ValueFeatures would require full code traversal of coderules program
to find out whether a value feature is used to carry smth of `node` type.
Relevant to MPSCR-62.
Motivation is that implicit (non-overriden) list features must unify
with list of any length. Consider an example:
`classifier(cls: node-ptr/A/) = classifier(cls: node-ptr/A/ param: [B,C])`
With previous approach it would fail, which seems counter-intuitive to me.
So, if empty list (e.g. of type parameters) is meant, then it must be
specified explicitly.
There's one thing to remember, though: such wildcard list features
won't match with MetaLogicalArrays in rule heads.
(e.g. see dpromote_* rules and consider what happens when
a classifier with unbound `parameter` feature comes in)
Avoides the need to exactly duplicate features of ancestors.
Opens possibility to match on super-terms
with partially provided (overriden) features.
For example, suppose there's `typeParameterized(child: param)`
term which is extended by `classifier` and `methodSignature`.
Then it becomes possible to write a common rule for both terms,
matching on `typeParameterized(param=[Smth])`.
LogicalUtil defines a bunch of overloaded methods that help dispatch
data form construction based on runtime class of logical variable.
This eliminates the need to use coerce in generator template.
Grigorii Kirgizov