mirror of https://github.com/apache/cassandra
Fix testPartitionDeletionRangeDeletionTie
authored by Ekaterina Dimitrova based on solution provided by Benjamin Lerer; reviewed by Jacek Lewandowski, Benjamin Lerer and Berenguer Blasi for CASSANDRA-16512
This commit is contained in:
parent
188997026e
commit
0a4b997337
|
|
@ -344,6 +344,11 @@ public class SinglePartitionSliceCommandTest
|
|||
{
|
||||
cfs.truncateBlocking();
|
||||
|
||||
// timestamp and USING TIMESTAMP have different values to ensure the correct timestamp (the one specified in the
|
||||
// query) is the one being picked up. For safety reason we want to be able to ensure that further to its main goal
|
||||
// the test can also detect wrongful change of the code. The current timestamp retrieved from the ClientState is
|
||||
// ignored but nowInSeconds is retrieved from it and used for the DeletionTime. It shows the difference between the
|
||||
// time at which the record was marked for deletion and the time at which it truly happened.
|
||||
final long timestamp = FBUtilities.timestampMicros();
|
||||
final int nowInSec = FBUtilities.nowInSeconds();
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -405,10 +410,24 @@ public class SinglePartitionSliceCommandTest
|
|||
BiFunction<Boolean, Boolean, List<Unfiltered>> tester = (flush, multiSSTable) ->
|
||||
{
|
||||
cfs.truncateBlocking();
|
||||
QueryProcessor.executeOnceInternal("DELETE FROM ks.partition_range_deletion USING TIMESTAMP 10 WHERE k=1");
|
||||
|
||||
// timestamp and USING TIMESTAMP have different values to ensure the correct timestamp (the one specified in the
|
||||
// query) is the one being picked up. For safety reason we want to be able to ensure that further to its main goal
|
||||
// the test can also detect wrongful change of the code. The current timestamp retrieved from the ClientState is
|
||||
// ignored but nowInSeconds is retrieved from it and used for the DeletionTime. It shows the difference between the
|
||||
// time at which the record was marked for deletion and the time at which it truly happened.
|
||||
|
||||
final long timestamp = FBUtilities.timestampMicros();
|
||||
final int nowInSec = FBUtilities.nowInSeconds();
|
||||
|
||||
QueryProcessor.executeOnceInternalWithNowAndTimestamp(nowInSec,
|
||||
timestamp,
|
||||
"DELETE FROM ks.partition_range_deletion USING TIMESTAMP 10 WHERE k=1");
|
||||
if (flush && multiSSTable)
|
||||
cfs.forceBlockingFlush();
|
||||
QueryProcessor.executeOnceInternal("DELETE FROM ks.partition_range_deletion USING TIMESTAMP 10 WHERE k=1 and c1=1");
|
||||
QueryProcessor.executeOnceInternalWithNowAndTimestamp(nowInSec,
|
||||
timestamp,
|
||||
"DELETE FROM ks.partition_range_deletion USING TIMESTAMP 10 WHERE k=1 and c1=1");
|
||||
if (flush)
|
||||
cfs.forceBlockingFlush();
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue