Signed-off-by: mohammedabdulwahhab <furkhan324@berkeley.edu> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| cli | ||
| client | ||
| common | ||
| failover_lock | ||
| integrations | ||
| server | ||
| README.md | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| __main__.py | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| setup.py | ||
README.md
GPU Memory Service (GMS)
Overview
The GPU Memory Service (GMS) is an out-of-process GPU memory manager that decouples ownership of GPU memory from the processes that use it. This enables:
- Zero-copy sharing of GPU memory across multiple processes
- Data survival across process crashes
- Fast model loading via memory import instead of disk I/O for subsequent workers
GMS provides PyTorch integration via CUDAPluggableAllocator and pre-built integrations for inference frameworks like vLLM and SGLang.
Problem Statement
In traditional LLM inference deployments, each worker process:
- Loads model weights from disk/network into GPU memory
- Owns that GPU memory for the lifetime of the process
- Cannot share weights with other workers on the same GPU
This leads to:
- Slow worker startup (weight loading is I/O bound)
- Memory waste (duplicate weights when running multiple workers)
- No crash resilience (GPU memory lost when process dies)
Solution Architecture
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ GMS Server │ │ GMSClientMemoryManager (Writer) │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ ┌────────────────┐ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Memory Manager │ │ ◄── Unix ───────►│ │ GMSRPCClient │ │ │
│ │ └────────────────┘ │ Socket │ └─────────────────────────────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ + │ │ │
│ │ ┌────────────────┐ │ FD │ Writer-only: create_mapping, commit │ │
│ │ │ State Machine │ │ (SCM_RIGHTS) └─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ └────────────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ ┌────────────────┐ │ │ GMSClientMemoryManager (Reader) │ │
│ │ │ Metadata Store │ │ │ │ │
│ │ └────────────────┘ │ ◄── Unix ───────►│ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Socket │ │ GMSRPCClient │ │ │
│ └────────────────────┘ + │ └─────────────────────────────────┘ │ │
│ FD │ │ │
│ (SCM_RIGHTS) │ Reader-only: create_mapping (import), │ │
│ │ unmap_all_vas, remap │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Core Components
GMS follows a client-server architecture where the server owns GPU memory allocations and the clients map that memory into their own address spaces. The key insight is that the socket connection itself acts as a distributed lock.
Server
The GMS server runs as an independent process that manages GPU memory without ever mapping it to its own address space. This design allows the server to:
- Survive GPU driver failures - no CUDA context means no vulnerability to driver resets
- Outlive client processes - memory persists across client crashes
- Arbitrate access - enforce single-writer, multiple-reader semantics
The server consists of three main components:
-
Memory Manager - Allocates physical GPU memory via CUDA VMM (
cuMemCreate) and exports shareable file descriptors (cuMemExportToShareableHandle). Critically, it never callscuMemMap- clients handle all virtual address mapping. -
State Machine (FSM) - Manages the global lock state and enforces access rules that ensures consistency across multiple clients. See State Machine below for details.
-
Metadata Store - Key-value store for tensor metadata (shapes, dtypes, offsets), enabling clients to reconstruct model structure.
Client
Clients connect to the server to acquire locks and access GPU memory. Two client classes are provided:
-
GMSRPCClient - Low-level RPC client for direct protocol access. Handles socket communication, msgpack serialization, and file descriptor passing via
SCM_RIGHTS. The socket connection is the lock - connection lifetime equals lock lifetime, providing automatic crash resilience. -
GMSClientMemoryManager - High-level client that wraps
GMSRPCClientand handles all CUDA VMM operations for memory import and mapping safely:- Imports file descriptors and converts them to CUDA memory handles
- Reserves virtual address space and maps physical memory
- Sets appropriate access permissions (RW for writers, RO for readers)
- Supports unmap/remap for VA-stable memory release under memory pressure
Note: Always use
GMSClientMemoryManagerto interact with GMS from client code. The low-levelGMSRPCClientis an implementation detail and should not be used directly.
Memory Allocation and Import Flow
The following diagram shows how GMSClientMemoryManager interacts with the server and GPU. Writers allocate new memory while readers import existing allocations - both flows share the same export/import/map sequence.
sequenceDiagram
participant C as GMSClientMemoryManager
participant S as GMS Server
participant GPU as GPU Memory
%% Connection
C->>S: Connect (Unix Socket)
C->>S: HandshakeRequest(lock_type)
S-->>C: HandshakeResponse(granted_lock)
%% Allocation (Writer only)
rect rgb(255, 245, 230)
Note over C,GPU: Writer only: Allocate new memory
C->>S: AllocateRequest(size, tag)
S->>GPU: cuMemCreate(size)
GPU-->>S: handle
S-->>C: AllocateResponse(allocation_id)
end
%% Export/Import (Both Writer and Reader)
Note over C,GPU: Both Writer and Reader: Export and map
C->>S: ExportRequest(allocation_id)
S->>GPU: cuMemExportToShareableHandle(handle)
GPU-->>S: fd
S-->>C: Response + fd (via SCM_RIGHTS)
C->>GPU: cuMemImportFromShareableHandle(fd)
C->>GPU: cuMemAddressReserve(size)
C->>GPU: cuMemMap(va, handle)
C->>GPU: cuMemSetAccess(va, RW or RO)
Note over C,GPU: Memory now accessible at VA
State Machine
The server maintains a finite state machine (FSM) that governs lock acquisition and memory access. The state is derived from the current connections rather than stored explicitly.
States and Transitions
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> EMPTY
EMPTY --> RW : RW_CONNECT
RW --> COMMITTED : RW_COMMIT
RW --> EMPTY : RW_ABORT
COMMITTED --> RW : RW_CONNECT
COMMITTED --> RO : RO_CONNECT
RO --> RO : RO_CONNECT
RO --> RO : RO_DISCONNECT (not last)
RO --> COMMITTED : RO_DISCONNECT (last)
State Descriptions
| State | Description | Can Connect RW | Can Connect RO |
|---|---|---|---|
EMPTY |
No connections, no committed weights | ✓ | ✗ |
RW |
Writer connected (exclusive access) | ✗ | ✗ |
COMMITTED |
Weights published, no active connections | ✓ | ✓ |
RO |
One or more readers connected (shared access) | ✗ | ✓ |
Events
| Event | Trigger | Description |
|---|---|---|
RW_CONNECT |
Writer connects | Acquires exclusive write lock |
RW_COMMIT |
Writer calls commit() |
Publishes weights, releases lock |
RW_ABORT |
Writer disconnects without commit | Discards allocations, releases lock |
RO_CONNECT |
Reader connects | Acquires shared read lock |
RO_DISCONNECT |
Reader disconnects | Releases shared lock; if last reader, returns to COMMITTED |
Lock Semantics
The socket connection is the lock:
- Crash resilience: Connection close (including process crash) automatically releases the lock
- No explicit unlock: Eliminates forgotten locks and deadlocks
- Atomic transitions: State changes happen atomically with socket operations
Sequence Diagrams
Writer Flow (Cold Start)
The first worker loads weights from disk and publishes them to GMS.
sequenceDiagram
participant W as Writer Process
participant C as GMSClientMemoryManager
participant S as GMS Server
W->>C: mgr = GMSClientMemoryManager(socket_path, device=0)
W->>C: mgr.connect(RW)
C->>S: HandshakeRequest(lock_type=RW)
S-->>C: HandshakeResponse(success=true)
loop For each tensor
W->>C: mgr.create_mapping(size=size, tag=tag)
Note over C,S: See Memory Allocation Flow above
W->>C: mgr.metadata_put(key, allocation_id, offset, shape)
end
W->>C: mgr.commit()
C->>S: CommitRequest()
S->>S: FSM: RW → COMMITTED
S-->>C: CommitResponse(success=true)
Reader Flow (Warm Start)
Subsequent workers import weights from GMS instead of loading from disk.
sequenceDiagram
participant R as Reader Process
participant C as GMSClientMemoryManager
participant S as GMS Server
R->>C: mgr = GMSClientMemoryManager(socket_path, device=0)
R->>C: mgr.connect(RO)
C->>S: HandshakeRequest(lock_type=RO)
S-->>C: HandshakeResponse(success=true, committed=true)
R->>C: mgr.metadata_list()
S-->>C: keys=[...]
loop For each tensor key
R->>C: mgr.metadata_get(key)
S-->>C: allocation_id, offset, shape
R->>C: mgr.create_mapping(allocation_id=allocation_id)
Note over C,S: See Memory Import Flow above
end
Note over R,C: Keep connection open during inference
Unmap/Remap Flow (Memory Pressure)
Readers can temporarily release GPU memory while preserving virtual address reservations. This enables "shadow engine" patterns where inactive workers release memory for active ones.
sequenceDiagram
participant R as Reader Process
participant C as GMSClientMemoryManager
participant S as GMS Server
participant GPU as GPU Memory
Note over R,GPU: Need to temporarily release GPU memory
R->>C: mgr.unmap_all_vas()
C->>GPU: cudaDeviceSynchronize()
loop For each mapping
C->>GPU: cuMemUnmap(va)
C->>GPU: cuMemRelease(handle)
Note over C: Keep VA reservation!
end
R->>C: mgr.disconnect()
C->>S: Close socket (release RO lock)
S->>S: FSM: RO → COMMITTED (if last reader)
Note over R,GPU: GPU memory released, VA preserved
Note over R,GPU: Another writer could modify weights here
R->>C: mgr.connect(RO)
C->>S: HandshakeRequest(lock_type=RO)
S->>S: FSM: COMMITTED → RO
S-->>C: HandshakeResponse(success=true)
R->>C: mgr.remap_all_vas()
C->>S: GetStateHashRequest()
S-->>C: GetStateHashResponse(hash)
alt hash == saved_hash
loop For each preserved VA
C->>S: ExportRequest(allocation_id)
S-->>C: Response + fd
C->>GPU: cuMemImportFromShareableHandle(fd)
C->>GPU: cuMemMap(same_va, handle)
Note over C: Tensors valid at same addresses!
end
else hash != saved_hash
C-->>R: StaleMemoryLayoutError
Note over R: Must re-import from scratch
end
Auto-Mode (RW_OR_RO)
The RW_OR_RO mode automatically selects writer or reader based on server state, simplifying multi-worker deployments.
sequenceDiagram
participant P as Process
participant C as GMSClientMemoryManager
participant S as GMS Server
Note over P,S: Auto-mode: Writer if first, Reader if weights exist
P->>C: mgr = GMSClientMemoryManager(socket_path, device=0)
P->>C: mgr.connect(RW_OR_RO)
C->>S: HandshakeRequest(lock_type=RW_OR_RO)
alt No committed weights AND no RW holder
S->>S: Grant RW lock
S->>S: FSM: EMPTY → RW
S-->>C: HandshakeResponse(granted=RW, committed=false)
Note over P: First process - load from disk
else Weights already committed
S->>S: Grant RO lock
S->>S: FSM: COMMITTED → RO
S-->>C: HandshakeResponse(granted=RO, committed=true)
Note over P: Subsequent process - import from GMS
else RW held by another
S->>S: Wait for RO availability
S->>S: FSM: COMMITTED → RO
S-->>C: HandshakeResponse(granted=RO, committed=true)
Note over P: Wait for writer to finish
end
Key Design Decisions
1. No VA Mapping on Server
The server never maps memory to virtual addresses (cuMemMap). This means:
- No CUDA context required on the server
- Server can survive GPU driver resets
- Memory management is fully delegated to clients
2. Socket-as-Lock
The socket connection is the lock:
- RW lock: Exclusive connection (only one RW at a time)
- RO lock: Shared connection (multiple RO allowed)
- Lock release = socket close (automatic on crash)
Benefits:
- Crash resilience: If a reader crashes, its lock is automatically released
- No explicit unlock: No forgotten locks or deadlocks
3. VA-Stable Unmap/Remap
During unmap_all_vas():
- Physical memory is released (
cuMemUnmap+cuMemRelease) - VA reservations are kept (
cuMemAddressReservestill valid)
During remap_all_vas():
- Same VAs are reused for mapping
- Tensor pointers remain valid (no need to update PyTorch tensors)
4. Memory Layout Hash
On commit, the server computes a hash of:
- All allocation IDs, sizes, and tags
- All metadata entries
On remap_all_vas(), this hash is checked:
- If match: Safe to remap (layout unchanged)
- If mismatch: Raise
StaleMemoryLayoutError(must re-import)
Important: This detects structural changes, not content changes. Weight values can be modified in-place (e.g., RL training updates) as long as the structure is preserved.
Wire Protocol
Message Format
┌──────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Length (4B) │ msgpack-encoded Message │
│ big-endian │ │
└──────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────┘
FD Passing
File descriptors are passed out-of-band using Unix socket SCM_RIGHTS:
# Server side (send FD)
socket.send_fds(sock, [message_bytes], [fd])
# Client side (receive FD)
data, fds, _, _ = socket.recv_fds(sock, bufsize, maxfds=1)
fd = fds[0] if fds else -1
API Reference
GMSClientMemoryManager
The API is organized in two tiers. Tier 2 (convenience) is what integrations normally use. Tier 1 (atomic) exposes individual operations for advanced callers.
class GMSClientMemoryManager:
def __init__(socket_path: str, *, device: int = 0): ...
# Properties
@property granted_lock_type: Optional[GrantedLockType]
@property is_connected: bool
@property is_unmapped: bool
@property total_bytes: int
# --- Tier 1: Connection ---
def connect(lock_type: RequestedLockType, timeout_ms: Optional[int] = None) -> None
def disconnect() -> None
# --- Tier 1: Handle ops (server-side, RW only) ---
def allocate_handle(size: int, tag: str = "default") -> str # Returns allocation_id
def export_handle(allocation_id: str) -> int # Returns FD
def get_handle_info(allocation_id: str) -> AllocationInfo
def free_handle(allocation_id: str) -> bool
def clear_all_handles() -> int # Returns count cleared
def commit() -> bool # Transition to COMMITTED
def get_memory_layout_hash() -> str
def list_handles(tag: Optional[str] = None) -> List[Dict]
# --- Tier 1: VA ops (local) ---
def reserve_va(size: int) -> int # Returns VA
def map_va(fd, va, size, allocation_id, tag) -> int # Returns handle
def unmap_va(va: int) -> None # Keeps VA reservation
def free_va(va: int) -> None # Releases VA reservation
# --- Tier 1: Metadata ---
def metadata_put(key: str, allocation_id: str, offset: int, value: bytes) -> bool
def metadata_get(key: str) -> Optional[Tuple[str, int, bytes]]
def metadata_list(prefix: str = "") -> List[str]
def metadata_delete(key: str) -> bool
# --- Tier 2: Convenience ---
def create_mapping(allocation_id=None, size=0, tag="default") -> int # Allocate or import
def destroy_mapping(va: int) -> None
def unmap_all_vas() -> None # Sync + unmap all, preserve VA reservations
def remap_all_vas() -> None # Re-import at preserved VAs (checks layout hash)
def reallocate_all_handles(tag="default") -> None # Fresh server handles for preserved VAs
def close(free: bool = False) -> None
Limitations
- Single-GPU per server: Each GMS server manages one GPU device
- CUDA VMM required: Requires a GPU with Virtual Memory Management support. Check at runtime via
CU_DEVICE_ATTRIBUTE_VIRTUAL_MEMORY_MANAGEMENT_SUPPORTED- there is no guaranteed minimum compute capability - No content validation: Remap doesn't detect in-place weight modifications
Framework Integration (vLLM / SGLang)
GMS provides pre-built integrations for vLLM and SGLang. Enable GMS by passing --load-format gms when launching an engine.
How It Works
When --load-format gms is set:
- A GMS server must already be running for the target GPU device. The engine connects to it via a Unix socket derived from the GPU UUID.
- The engine uses
RW_OR_ROmode by default: the first process gets RW (loads weights from disk, commits to GMS), and subsequent processes get RO (import weights from GMS metadata). - Weights are managed by GMS; KV cache is managed by the framework's own allocator (e.g., vLLM's
CuMemAllocator).
vLLM
python -m dynamo.vllm \
--model <model> \
--load-format gms \
--enable-sleep-mode \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.9
The integration uses a custom worker class (GMSWorker) that:
- Establishes the GMS connection early in
init_device()so vLLM'sMemorySnapshotcan account for committed weights - Registers a custom model loader (
GMSModelLoader) for thegmsload format - Patches
torch.cuda.empty_cacheto avoid releasing GMS-managed memory - Routes weight allocation through a
CUDAPluggableAllocatorbacked by GMS
SGLang
python -m dynamo.sglang \
--model-path <model> \
--load-format gms \
--enable-memory-saver \
--mem-fraction-static 0.9
The integration patches torch_memory_saver to route weight operations through GMS:
- Weights (
"weights"/"model_weights"tags) go throughGMSMemorySaverImpl - Other tags (e.g.,
"kv_cache") are delegated to the default torch mempool implementation - The
--enable-memory-saverflag is required to activate the memory saver pathway
Shadow Engine Failover (Sleep / Wake)
Both integrations support releasing and reclaiming GPU memory for shadow engine patterns. The API names differ by framework:
- vLLM:
sleep/wake_up(via/engine/sleepand/engine/wake_upHTTP endpoints) - SGLang:
release_memory_occupation/resume_memory_occupation(via the corresponding HTTP endpoints)
Under the hood, sleeping calls unmap_all_vas() + disconnect() to release GPU memory while preserving VA reservations, and waking calls connect(RO) + remap_all_vas() to re-import weights at the same virtual addresses. Tensor pointers remain valid, so no model re-initialization is needed.
This enables a shadow engine to release its GPU memory, let a primary engine use the GPU, and then reclaim the memory after the primary is killed.
Configuration via model_loader_extra_config
To force read-only mode (import only, never load from disk), pass gms_read_only via the framework's --model-loader-extra-config flag:
--model-loader-extra-config '{"gms_read_only": true}'
This forces RO lock mode instead of the default RW_OR_RO auto-detection. The engine will only import existing committed weights and fail if none are available.