[ Upstream commit eef8a42d6ce087d1c81c960ae0d14f955b742feb ]
The `BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE`'s value is `UINT32_MAX >> 8`, so define an array
with it on stack caused an overflow.
Signed-off-by: Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200710092035.28919-1-ethercflow@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c3eeaae9fd736b7f2afbda8d3cbb1cbae06decf3 ]
Something changed recently to uncover this warning:
samples/vfs/test-statx.c:24:15: warning: `struct foo' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
24 | #define statx foo
| ^~~
Which is due the use of "struct statx" (here, "struct foo") in a function
prototype argument list before it has been defined:
int
# 56 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h"
foo
# 56 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h" 3 4
(int __dirfd, const char *__restrict __path, int __flags,
unsigned int __mask, struct
# 57 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h"
foo
# 57 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h" 3 4
*__restrict __buf)
__attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__)) __attribute__ ((__nonnull__ (2, 5)));
Add explicit struct before #include to avoid warning.
Fixes: f1b5618e013a ("vfs: Add a sample program for the new mount API")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/202006282213.C516EA6@keescook
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6903cdae9f9f08d61e49c16cbef11c293e33a615 ]
Memset on the pointer right after malloc can cause a NULL pointer
deference if it failed to allocate memory. A simple fix is to
replace malloc()/memset() pair with a simple call to calloc().
Fixes: 0fca931a6f21 ("samples/bpf: program demonstrating access to xdp_rxq_info")
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Singh <gaurav1086@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6a09815428547657f3ffd2f5c31ac2a191e7fdf3 ]
xdp_redirect_cpu is currently failing in bpf_prog_load_xattr()
allocating cpu_map map if CONFIG_NR_CPUS is less than 64 since
cpu_map_alloc() requires max_entries to be less than NR_CPUS.
Set cpu_map max_entries according to NR_CPUS in xdp_redirect_cpu_kern.c
and get currently running cpus in xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/374472755001c260158c4e4b22f193bdd3c56fb7.1589300442.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 23ad04669f81f958e9a4121b0266228d2eb3c357 ]
GCC 10 is very strict about symbol clash, and lwt_len_hist_user contains
a symbol which clashes with libbpf:
/usr/bin/ld: samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `bpf_log_buf'; samples/bpf/bpf_load.o:(.bss+0x8c0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
bpf_log_buf here seems to be a leftover, so removing it.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200511113234.80722-1-mcroce@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit bdebd6a2831b6fab69eb85cee74a8ba77f1a1cc2 upstream.
remap_vmalloc_range() has had various issues with the bounds checks it
promises to perform ("This function checks that addr is a valid
vmalloc'ed area, and that it is big enough to cover the vma") over time,
e.g.:
- not detecting pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT overflow
- not detecting (pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT)+usize overflow
- not checking whether addr and addr+(pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT) are the same
vmalloc allocation
- comparing a potentially wildly out-of-bounds pointer with the end of
the vmalloc region
In particular, since commit fc9702273e2e ("bpf: Add mmap() support for
BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY"), unprivileged users can cause kernel null pointer
dereferences by calling mmap() on a BPF map with a size that is bigger
than the distance from the start of the BPF map to the end of the
address space.
This could theoretically be used as a kernel ASLR bypass, by using
whether mmap() with a given offset oopses or returns an error code to
perform a binary search over the possible address range.
To allow remap_vmalloc_range_partial() to verify that addr and
addr+(pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT) are in the same vmalloc region, pass the offset
to remap_vmalloc_range_partial() instead of adding it to the pointer in
remap_vmalloc_range().
In remap_vmalloc_range_partial(), fix the check against
get_vm_area_size() by using size comparisons instead of pointer
comparisons, and add checks for pgoff.
Fixes: 833423143c3a ("[PATCH] mm: introduce remap_vmalloc_range()")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200415222312.236431-1-jannh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wenbo Zhang