commit 04b38d012556199ba4c31195940160e0c44c64f0 upstream.
We don't actually care about the value, since the kernel will panic
before that; but a value should nonetheless be returned, otherwise the
compiler will complain.
Fixes: 8112c4f140fa ("seccomp: remove 2-phase API")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7+
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210111172839.640914-1-paul@crapouillou.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit dfe719fef03d752f1682fa8aeddf30ba501c8555 upstream.
Currently, init_listener() tries to prevent adding a filter with
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER if one of the existing filters already
has a listener. However, this check happens without holding any lock that
would prevent another thread from concurrently installing a new filter
(potentially with a listener) on top of the ones we already have.
Theoretically, this is also a data race: The plain load from
current->seccomp.filter can race with concurrent writes to the same
location.
Fix it by moving the check into the region that holds the siglock to guard
against concurrent TSYNC.
(The "Fixes" tag points to the commit that introduced the theoretical
data race; concurrent installation of another filter with TSYNC only
became possible later, in commit 51891498f2da ("seccomp: allow TSYNC and
USER_NOTIF together").)
Fixes: 6a21cc50f0c7 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace")
Reviewed-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005014401.490175-1-jannh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 47e33c05f9f07cac3de833e531bcac9ae052c7ca ]
When SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID was first introduced it had the wrong
direction flag set. While this isn't a big deal as nothing currently
enforces these bits in the kernel, it should be defined correctly. Fix
the define and provide support for the old command until it is no longer
needed for backward compatibility.
Fixes: 6a21cc50f0c7 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 3db81afd99494a33f1c3839103f0429c8f30cb9d upstream.
Executing the seccomp_bpf testsuite under a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit
userland (both s390 and x86) doesn't work because there's no compat_ioctl
handler defined. Add the handler.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 6a21cc50f0c7 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310123332.42255-1-svens@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Paul Cercueil