commit 3272cfc2525b3a2810a59312d7a1e6f04a0ca3ef upstream.
page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The
routine copy_huge_page_from_user can encounter gigantic pages, yet it
assumes page structs are contiguous when copying pages from user space.
Since page structs for the target gigantic page are not contiguous, the
data copied from user space could overwrite other pages not associated
with the gigantic page and cause data corruption.
Non-contiguous page structs are generally not an issue. However, they can
exist with a specific kernel configuration and hotplug operations. For
example: Configure the kernel with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM and
!CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. Then, hotplug add memory for the area where
the gigantic page will be allocated.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217184926.33567-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: 8fb5debc5fcd ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: add hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte for userfaultfd support")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 90a3e375d324b2255b83e3dd29e99e2b05d82aaf ]
Since commit 42e4089c7890 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Disallow non privileged
high MMIO PROT_NONE mappings"), when the first pfn modify is not allowed,
we would break the loop with pte unchanged. Then the wrong pte - 1 would
be passed to pte_unmap_unlock.
Andi said:
"While the fix is correct, I'm not sure if it actually is a real bug.
Is there any architecture that would do something else than unlocking
the underlying page? If it's just the underlying page then it should
be always the same page, so no bug"
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210109080118.20885-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 42e4089c789 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Disallow non privileged high MMIO PROT_NONE mappings")
Signed-off-by: Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 9fd6dad1261a541b3f5fa7dc5b152222306e6702 upstream.
Currently, the follow_pfn function is exported for modules but
follow_pte is not. However, follow_pfn is very easy to misuse,
because it does not provide protections (so most of its callers
assume the page is writable!) and because it returns after having
already unlocked the page table lock.
Provide instead a simplified version of follow_pte that does
not have the pmdpp and range arguments. The older version
survives as follow_invalidate_pte() for use by fs/dax.c.
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit ff5c19ed4b087073cea38ff0edc80c23d7256943 upstream.
Merge __follow_pte_pmd, follow_pte_pmd and follow_pte into a single
follow_pte function and just pass two additional NULL arguments for the
two previous follow_pte callers.
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: merge fix for "s390/pci: remove races against pte updates"]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201111221254.7f6a3658@canb.auug.org.au
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029101432.47011-3-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7336375734d65ecc82956b59a79cf5deccce880c upstream.
Patch series "simplify follow_pte a bit".
This small series drops the not needed follow_pte_pmd exports, and
simplifies the follow_pte family of functions a bit.
This patch (of 2):
follow_pte_pmd() is only used by the DAX code, which can't be modular.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029101432.47011-2-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit c3e5ea6ee574ae5e845a40ac8198de1fb63bb3ab ]
Jeff Moyer has reported that one of xfstests triggers a warning when run
on DAX-enabled filesystem:
WARNING: CPU: 76 PID: 51024 at mm/memory.c:2317 wp_page_copy+0xc40/0xd50
...
wp_page_copy+0x98c/0xd50 (unreliable)
do_wp_page+0xd8/0xad0
__handle_mm_fault+0x748/0x1b90
handle_mm_fault+0x120/0x1f0
__do_page_fault+0x240/0xd70
do_page_fault+0x38/0xd0
handle_page_fault+0x10/0x30
The warning happens on failed __copy_from_user_inatomic() which tries to
copy data into a CoW page.
This happens because of race between MADV_DONTNEED and CoW page fault:
CPU0 CPU1
handle_mm_fault()
do_wp_page()
wp_page_copy()
do_wp_page()
madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
zap_page_range()
zap_pte_range()
ptep_get_and_clear_full()
<TLB flush>
__copy_from_user_inatomic()
sees empty PTE and fails
WARN_ON_ONCE(1)
clear_page()
The solution is to re-try __copy_from_user_inatomic() under PTL after
checking that PTE is matches the orig_pte.
The second copy attempt can still fail, like due to non-readable PTE, but
there's nothing reasonable we can do about, except clearing the CoW page.
Reported-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200218154151.13349-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 83d116c53058d505ddef051e90ab27f57015b025 ]
When we tested pmdk unit test [1] vmmalloc_fork TEST3 on arm64 guest, there
will be a double page fault in __copy_from_user_inatomic of cow_user_page.
To reproduce the bug, the cmd is as follows after you deployed everything:
make -C src/test/vmmalloc_fork/ TEST_TIME=60m check
Below call trace is from arm64 do_page_fault for debugging purpose:
[ 110.016195] Call trace:
[ 110.016826] do_page_fault+0x5a4/0x690
[ 110.017812] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0
[ 110.018726] el1_da+0x20/0xc4
[ 110.019492] __arch_copy_from_user+0x180/0x280
[ 110.020646] do_wp_page+0xb0/0x860
[ 110.021517] __handle_mm_fault+0x994/0x1338
[ 110.022606] handle_mm_fault+0xe8/0x180
[ 110.023584] do_page_fault+0x240/0x690
[ 110.024535] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0
[ 110.025423] el0_da+0x20/0x24
The pte info before __copy_from_user_inatomic is (PTE_AF is cleared):
[ffff9b007000] pgd=000000023d4f8003, pud=000000023da9b003,
pmd=000000023d4b3003, pte=360000298607bd3
As told by Catalin: "On arm64 without hardware Access Flag, copying from
user will fail because the pte is old and cannot be marked young. So we
always end up with zeroed page after fork() + CoW for pfn mappings. we
don't always have a hardware-managed access flag on arm64."
This patch fixes it by calling pte_mkyoung. Also, the parameter is
changed because vmf should be passed to cow_user_page()
Add a WARN_ON_ONCE when __copy_from_user_inatomic() returns error
in case there can be some obscure use-case (by Kirill).
[1] https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/tree/master/src/test/vmmalloc_fork
Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
Reported-by: Yibo Cai <Yibo.Cai@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>