commit 97c753e62e6c31a404183898d950d8c08d752dbd upstream.
Fix kprobe_on_func_entry() returns error code instead of false so that
register_kretprobe() can return an appropriate error code.
append_trace_kprobe() expects the kprobe registration returns -ENOENT
when the target symbol is not found, and it checks whether the target
module is unloaded or not. If the target module doesn't exist, it
defers to probe the target symbol until the module is loaded.
However, since register_kretprobe() returns -EINVAL instead of -ENOENT
in that case, it always fail on putting the kretprobe event on unloaded
modules. e.g.
Kprobe event:
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo p xfs:xfs_end_io >> kprobe_events
[ 16.515574] trace_kprobe: This probe might be able to register after target module is loaded. Continue.
Kretprobe event: (p -> r)
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo r xfs:xfs_end_io >> kprobe_events
sh: write error: Invalid argument
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing # cat error_log
[ 41.122514] trace_kprobe: error: Failed to register probe event
Command: r xfs:xfs_end_io
^
To fix this bug, change kprobe_on_func_entry() to detect symbol lookup
failure and return -ENOENT in that case. Otherwise it returns -EINVAL
or 0 (succeeded, given address is on the entry).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/161176187132.1067016.8118042342894378981.stgit@devnote2
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 59158ec4aef7 ("tracing/kprobes: Check the probe on unloaded module correctly")
Reported-by: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 82d083ab60c3693201c6f5c7a5f23a6ed422098d upstream.
Since kprobe_event= cmdline option allows user to put kprobes on the
functions in initmem, kprobe has to make such probes gone after boot.
Currently the probes on the init functions in modules will be handled
by module callback, but the kernel init text isn't handled.
Without this, kprobes may access non-exist text area to disable or
remove it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159972810544.428528.1839307531600646955.stgit@devnote2
Fixes: 970988e19eb0 ("tracing/kprobe: Add kprobe_event= boot parameter")
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9b38cc704e844e41d9cf74e647bff1d249512cb3 upstream.
Ziqian reported lockup when adding retprobe on _raw_spin_lock_irqsave.
My test was also able to trigger lockdep output:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.6.0-rc6+ #6 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
sched-messaging/2767 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff9a492798 (&(kretprobe_table_locks[i].lock)){-.-.}, at: kretprobe_hash_lock+0x52/0xa0
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff9a491a18 (&(kretprobe_table_locks[i].lock)){-.-.}, at: kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(kretprobe_table_locks[i].lock));
lock(&(kretprobe_table_locks[i].lock));
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
1 lock held by sched-messaging/2767:
#0: ffffffff9a491a18 (&(kretprobe_table_locks[i].lock)){-.-.}, at: kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 2767 Comm: sched-messaging Not tainted 5.6.0-rc6+ #6
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x96/0xe0
__lock_acquire.cold.57+0x173/0x2b7
? native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x42b/0x9e0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x590/0x590
? __lock_acquire+0xf63/0x4030
lock_acquire+0x15a/0x3d0
? kretprobe_hash_lock+0x52/0xa0
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x36/0x70
? kretprobe_hash_lock+0x52/0xa0
kretprobe_hash_lock+0x52/0xa0
trampoline_handler+0xf8/0x940
? kprobe_fault_handler+0x380/0x380
? find_held_lock+0x3a/0x1c0
kretprobe_trampoline+0x25/0x50
? lock_acquired+0x392/0xbc0
? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x70
? __get_valid_kprobe+0x1f0/0x1f0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3b/0x40
? finish_task_switch+0x4b9/0x6d0
? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
The code within the kretprobe handler checks for probe reentrancy,
so we won't trigger any _raw_spin_lock_irqsave probe in there.
The problem is in outside kprobe_flush_task, where we call:
kprobe_flush_task
kretprobe_table_lock
raw_spin_lock_irqsave
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
where _raw_spin_lock_irqsave triggers the kretprobe and installs
kretprobe_trampoline handler on _raw_spin_lock_irqsave return.
The kretprobe_trampoline handler is then executed with already
locked kretprobe_table_locks, and first thing it does is to
lock kretprobe_table_locks ;-) the whole lockup path like:
kprobe_flush_task
kretprobe_table_lock
raw_spin_lock_irqsave
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave ---> probe triggered, kretprobe_trampoline installed
---> kretprobe_table_locks locked
kretprobe_trampoline
trampoline_handler
kretprobe_hash_lock(current, &head, &flags); <--- deadlock
Adding kprobe_busy_begin/end helpers that mark code with fake
probe installed to prevent triggering of another kprobe within
this code.
Using these helpers in kprobe_flush_task, so the probe recursion
protection check is hit and the probe is never set to prevent
above lockup.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/158927059835.27680.7011202830041561604.stgit@devnote2
Fixes: ef53d9c5e4da ("kprobes: improve kretprobe scalability with hashed locking")
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: "Ziqian SUN (Zamir)" <zsun@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Masami Hiramatsu