[upstream commit da765a2f599304a81a25e77908d1790414ecdbb6]
This work adds program tracking to prog array maps. This is needed such
that upon prog array updates/deletions we can fix up all programs which
make use of this tail call map. We add ops->map_poke_{un,}track()
helpers to maps to maintain the list of programs and ops->map_poke_run()
for triggering the actual update.
bpf_array_aux is extended to contain the list head and poke_mutex in
order to serialize program patching during updates/deletions.
bpf_free_used_maps() will untrack the program shortly before dropping
the reference to the map. For clearing out the prog array once all urefs
are dropped we need to use schedule_work() to have a sleepable context.
The prog_array_map_poke_run() is triggered during updates/deletions and
walks the maintained prog list. It checks in their poke_tabs whether the
map and key is matching and runs the actual bpf_arch_text_poke() for
patching in the nop or new jmp location. Depending on the type of update,
we use one of BPF_MOD_{NOP_TO_JUMP,JUMP_TO_NOP,JUMP_TO_JUMP}.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1fb364bb3c565b3e415d5ea348f036ff379e779d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
[upstream commit a66886fe6c24ebeeb6dc10fbd9b75158029eacf7]
Add initial poke table data structures and management to the BPF
prog that can later be used by JITs. Also add an instance of poke
specific data for tail call maps; plan for later work is to extend
this also for BPF static keys.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1db285ec2ea4207ee0455b3f8e191a4fc58b9ade.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
[upstream commit 2beee5f57441413b64a9c2bd657e17beabb98d1c]
We're going to extend this with further information which is only
relevant for prog array at this point. Given this info is not used
in critical path, move it into its own structure such that the main
array map structure can be kept on diet.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b9ddccdb0f6f7026489ee955f16c96381e1e7238.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
[upstream commit 6332be04c039a72fca32ed0a4265bac58d606bb6]
We later on are going to need a sleepable context as opposed to plain
RCU callback in order to untrack programs we need to poke at runtime
and tracking as well as image update is performed under mutex.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/09823b1d5262876e9b83a8e75df04cf0467357a4.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
[upstream commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f88778d540ecfdcdaec5a41723]
Allow FENTRY/FEXIT BPF programs to attach to other BPF programs of any type
including their subprograms. This feature allows snooping on input and output
packets in XDP, TC programs including their return values. In order to do that
the verifier needs to track types not only of vmlinux, but types of other BPF
programs as well. The verifier also needs to translate uapi/linux/bpf.h types
used by networking programs into kernel internal BTF types used by FENTRY/FEXIT
BPF programs. In some cases LLVM optimizations can remove arguments from BPF
subprograms without adjusting BTF info that LLVM backend knows. When BTF info
disagrees with actual types that the verifiers sees the BPF trampoline has to
fallback to conservative and treat all arguments as u64. The FENTRY/FEXIT
program can still attach to such subprograms, but it won't be able to recognize
pointer types like 'struct sk_buff *' and it won't be able to pass them to
bpf_skb_output() for dumping packets to user space. The FENTRY/FEXIT program
would need to use bpf_probe_read_kernel() instead.
The BPF_PROG_LOAD command is extended with attach_prog_fd field. When it's set
to zero the attach_btf_id is one vmlinux BTF type ids. When attach_prog_fd
points to previously loaded BPF program the attach_btf_id is BTF type id of
main function or one of its subprograms.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191114185720.1641606-18-ast@kernel.org
[upstream commit 5964b2000f283ff5df366f718e0f083ebbaae977]
Add bpf_arch_text_poke() helper that is used by BPF trampoline logic to patch
nops/calls in kernel text into calls into BPF trampoline and to patch
calls/nops inside BPF programs too.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191114185720.1641606-4-ast@kernel.org
[upstream commit fec56f5890d93fc2ed74166c397dc186b1c25951]
Introduce BPF trampoline concept to allow kernel code to call into BPF programs
with practically zero overhead. The trampoline generation logic is
architecture dependent. It's converting native calling convention into BPF
calling convention. BPF ISA is 64-bit (even on 32-bit architectures). The
registers R1 to R5 are used to pass arguments into BPF functions. The main BPF
program accepts only single argument "ctx" in R1. Whereas CPU native calling
convention is different. x86-64 is passing first 6 arguments in registers
and the rest on the stack. x86-32 is passing first 3 arguments in registers.
sparc64 is passing first 6 in registers. And so on.
The trampolines between BPF and kernel already exist. BPF_CALL_x macros in
include/linux/filter.h statically compile trampolines from BPF into kernel
helpers. They convert up to five u64 arguments into kernel C pointers and
integers. On 64-bit architectures this BPF_to_kernel trampolines are nops. On
32-bit architecture they're meaningful.
The opposite job kernel_to_BPF trampolines is done by CAST_TO_U64 macros and
__bpf_trace_##call() shim functions in include/trace/bpf_probe.h. They convert
kernel function arguments into array of u64s that BPF program consumes via
R1=ctx pointer.
This patch set is doing the same job as __bpf_trace_##call() static
trampolines, but dynamically for any kernel function. There are ~22k global
kernel functions that are attachable via nop at function entry. The function
arguments and types are described in BTF. The job of btf_distill_func_proto()
function is to extract useful information from BTF into "function model" that
architecture dependent trampoline generators will use to generate assembly code
to cast kernel function arguments into array of u64s. For example the kernel
function eth_type_trans has two pointers. They will be casted to u64 and stored
into stack of generated trampoline. The pointer to that stack space will be
passed into BPF program in R1. On x86-64 such generated trampoline will consume
16 bytes of stack and two stores of %rdi and %rsi into stack. The verifier will
make sure that only two u64 are accessed read-only by BPF program. The verifier
will also recognize the precise type of the pointers being accessed and will
not allow typecasting of the pointer to a different type within BPF program.
The tracing use case in the datacenter demonstrated that certain key kernel
functions have (like tcp_retransmit_skb) have 2 or more kprobes that are always
active. Other functions have both kprobe and kretprobe. So it is essential to
keep both kernel code and BPF programs executing at maximum speed. Hence
generated BPF trampoline is re-generated every time new program is attached or
detached to maintain maximum performance.
To avoid the high cost of retpoline the attached BPF programs are called
directly. __bpf_prog_enter/exit() are used to support per-program execution
stats. In the future this logic will be optimized further by adding support
for bpf_stats_enabled_key inside generated assembly code. Introduction of
preemptible and sleepable BPF programs will completely remove the need to call
to __bpf_prog_enter/exit().
Detach of a BPF program from the trampoline should not fail. To avoid memory
allocation in detach path the half of the page is used as a reserve and flipped
after each attach/detach. 2k bytes is enough to call 40+ BPF programs directly
which is enough for BPF tracing use cases. This limit can be increased in the
future.
BPF_TRACE_FENTRY programs have access to raw kernel function arguments while
BPF_TRACE_FEXIT programs have access to kernel return value as well. Often
kprobe BPF program remembers function arguments in a map while kretprobe
fetches arguments from a map and analyzes them together with return value.
BPF_TRACE_FEXIT accelerates this typical use case.
Recursion prevention for kprobe BPF programs is done via per-cpu
bpf_prog_active counter. In practice that turned out to be a mistake. It
caused programs to randomly skip execution. The tracing tools missed results
they were looking for. Hence BPF trampoline doesn't provide builtin recursion
prevention. It's a job of BPF program itself and will be addressed in the
follow up patches.
BPF trampoline is intended to be used beyond tracing and fentry/fexit use cases
in the future. For example to remove retpoline cost from XDP programs.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191114185720.1641606-5-ast@kernel.org
[upstream commit b7b3fc8dd95bc02bd30680da258e09dda55270db]
Currently passing alignment greater than 4 to bpf_jit_binary_alloc does
not work: in such cases it silently aligns only to 4 bytes.
On s390, in order to load a constant from memory in a large (>512k) BPF
program, one must use lgrl instruction, whose memory operand must be
aligned on an 8-byte boundary.
This patch makes it possible to request 8-byte alignment from
bpf_jit_binary_alloc, and also makes it issue a warning when an
unsupported alignment is requested.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191115123722.58462-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
In the bpf interpreter mode, bpf_probe_read_kernel is used to read
from PTR_TO_BTF_ID's kernel object. It currently missed considering
the insn->off. This patch fixes it.
Fixes: 2a02759ef5f8 ("bpf: Add support for BTF pointers to interpreter")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191107014640.384083-1-kafai@fb.com
Commit 2a02759ef5f8 ("bpf: Add support for BTF pointers to interpreter")
explicitly states that the pointer to BTF object is a pointer to a kernel
object or NULL. Therefore we should also switch to using the strict kernel
probe helper which is restricted to kernel addresses only when architectures
have non-overlapping address spaces.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d2b90827837685424a4b8008dfe0460558abfada.1572649915.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Jiri reported crash when JIT is on, but net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms is off.
bpf_prog_kallsyms_find() was skipping addr->bpf_prog resolution
logic in oops and stack traces. That's incorrect.
It should only skip addr->name resolution for 'cat /proc/kallsyms'.
That's what bpf_jit_kallsyms and bpf_jit_harden protect.
Fixes: 3dec541b2e63 ("bpf: Add support for BTF pointers to x86 JIT")
Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191030233019.1187404-1-ast@kernel.org
[upstream commit 3dec541b2e632d630fe7142ed44f0b3702ef1f8c]
Pointer to BTF object is a pointer to kernel object or NULL.
Such pointers can only be used by BPF_LDX instructions.
The verifier changed their opcode from LDX|MEM|size
to LDX|PROBE_MEM|size to make JITing easier.
The number of entries in extable is the number of BPF_LDX insns
that access kernel memory via "pointer to BTF type".
Only these load instructions can fault.
Since x86 extable is relative it has to be allocated in the same
memory region as JITed code.
Allocate it prior to last pass of JITing and let the last pass populate it.
Pointer to extable in bpf_prog_aux is necessary to make page fault
handling fast.
Page fault handling is done in two steps:
1. bpf_prog_kallsyms_find() finds BPF program that page faulted.
It's done by walking rb tree.
2. then extable for given bpf program is binary searched.
This process is similar to how page faulting is done for kernel modules.
The exception handler skips over faulting x86 instruction and
initializes destination register with zero. This mimics exact
behavior of bpf_probe_read (when probe_kernel_read faults dest is zeroed).
JITs for other architectures can add support in similar way.
Until then they will reject unknown opcode and fallback to interpreter.
Since extable should be aligned and placed near JITed code
make bpf_jit_binary_alloc() return 4 byte aligned image offset,
so that extable aligning formula in bpf_int_jit_compile() doesn't need
to rely on internal implementation of bpf_jit_binary_alloc().
On x86 gcc defaults to 16-byte alignment for regular kernel functions
due to better performance. JITed code may be aligned to 16 in the future,
but it will use 4 in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016032505.2089704-10-ast@kernel.org
[upstream commit 2a02759ef5f8a34792df22b41d5e10658fd7bbd3]
Pointer to BTF object is a pointer to kernel object or NULL.
The memory access in the interpreter has to be done via probe_kernel_read
to avoid page faults.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016032505.2089704-9-ast@kernel.org
commit f5e81d1117501546b7be050c5fbafa6efd2c722c upstream.
In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction
/either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to
/no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected
by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already.
This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence'
instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation
as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled,
it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional
instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow
as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4
since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and
ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs.
The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does
annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers.
Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[OP: - adjusted context for 5.4
- apply riscv changes to /arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 28131e9d933339a92f78e7ab6429f4aaaa07061c ]
syzbot reported a shift-out-of-bounds that KUBSAN observed in the
interpreter:
[...]
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in kernel/bpf/core.c:1420:2
shift exponent 255 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'
CPU: 1 PID: 11097 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc2-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a lib/ubsan.c:148
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb1/0x181 lib/ubsan.c:327
___bpf_prog_run.cold+0x19/0x56c kernel/bpf/core.c:1420
__bpf_prog_run32+0x8f/0xd0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1735
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:644 [inline]
bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu include/linux/filter.h:624 [inline]
bpf_prog_run_clear_cb include/linux/filter.h:755 [inline]
run_filter+0x1a1/0x470 net/packet/af_packet.c:2031
packet_rcv+0x313/0x13e0 net/packet/af_packet.c:2104
dev_queue_xmit_nit+0x7c2/0xa90 net/core/dev.c:2387
xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3588 [inline]
dev_hard_start_xmit+0xad/0x920 net/core/dev.c:3609
__dev_queue_xmit+0x2121/0x2e00 net/core/dev.c:4182
__bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2116 [inline]
__bpf_redirect_no_mac net/core/filter.c:2141 [inline]
__bpf_redirect+0x548/0xc80 net/core/filter.c:2164
____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2448 [inline]
bpf_clone_redirect+0x2ae/0x420 net/core/filter.c:2420
___bpf_prog_run+0x34e1/0x77d0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1523
__bpf_prog_run512+0x99/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1737
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:644 [inline]
bpf_test_run+0x3ed/0xc50 net/bpf/test_run.c:50
bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0xabc/0x1c50 net/bpf/test_run.c:582
bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3127 [inline]
__do_sys_bpf+0x1ea9/0x4f00 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4406
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[...]
Generally speaking, KUBSAN reports from the kernel should be fixed.
However, in case of BPF, this particular report caused concerns since
the large shift is not wrong from BPF point of view, just undefined.
In the verifier, K-based shifts that are >= {64,32} (depending on the
bitwidth of the instruction) are already rejected. The register-based
cases were not given their content might not be known at verification
time. Ideas such as verifier instruction rewrite with an additional
AND instruction for the source register were brought up, but regularly
rejected due to the additional runtime overhead they incur.
As Edward Cree rightly put it:
Shifts by more than insn bitness are legal in the BPF ISA; they are
implementation-defined behaviour [of the underlying architecture],
rather than UB, and have been made legal for performance reasons.
Each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF shift operations to machine
instructions which produce implementation-defined results in such a
case; the resulting contents of the register may be arbitrary but
program behaviour as a whole remains defined.
Guard checks in the fast path (i.e. affecting JITted code) will thus
not be accepted.
The case of division by zero is not truly analogous here, as division
instructions on many of the JIT-targeted architectures will raise a
machine exception / fault on division by zero, whereas (to the best
of my knowledge) none will do so on an out-of-bounds shift.
Given the KUBSAN report only affects the BPF interpreter, but not JITs,
one solution is to add the ANDs with 63 or 31 into ___bpf_prog_run().
That would make the shifts defined, and thus shuts up KUBSAN, and the
compiler would optimize out the AND on any CPU that interprets the shift
amounts modulo the width anyway (e.g., confirmed from disassembly that
on x86-64 and arm64 the generated interpreter code is the same before
and after this fix).
The BPF interpreter is slow path, and most likely compiled out anyway
as distros select BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON to avoid speculative execution of
BPF instructions by the interpreter. Given the main argument was to
avoid sacrificing performance, the fact that the AND is optimized away
from compiler for mainstream archs helps as well as a solution moving
forward. Also add a comment on LSH/RSH/ARSH translation for JIT authors
to provide guidance when they see the ___bpf_prog_run() interpreter
code and use it as a model for a new JIT backend.
Reported-by: syzbot+bed360704c521841c85d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Kurt Manucredo <fuzzybritches0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: syzbot+bed360704c521841c85d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0000000000008f912605bd30d5d7@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/bac16d8d-c174-bdc4-91bd-bfa62b410190@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 080b6f40763565f65ebb9540219c71ce885cf568 ]
Commit 3193c0836 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for
___bpf_prog_run()") introduced a __no_fgcse macro that expands to a
function scope __attribute__((optimize("-fno-gcse"))), to disable a
GCC specific optimization that was causing trouble on x86 builds, and
was not expected to have any positive effect in the first place.
However, as the GCC manual documents, __attribute__((optimize))
is not for production use, and results in all other optimization
options to be forgotten for the function in question. This can
cause all kinds of trouble, but in one particular reported case,
it causes -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to be disregarded,
resulting in .eh_frame info to be emitted for the function.
This reverts commit 3193c0836, and instead, it disables the -fgcse
optimization for the entire source file, but only when building for
X86 using GCC with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON disabled. Note that the
original commit states that CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n triggers the issue,
whereas CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y performs better without the optimization,
so it is kept disabled in both cases.
Fixes: 3193c0836f20 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for ___bpf_prog_run()")
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdUg0WJHEcq6to0-eODpXPOywLot6UD2=GFHpzoj_hCoBQ@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201028171506.15682-2-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann