commit e0664ebcea6ac5e16da703409fb4bd61f8cd37d9 upstream.
Fix to return negative error code -ENOMEM from the kzalloc error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>
Fixes: db07cd26ac6a ("crypto: drbg - add FIPS 140-2 CTRNG for noise source")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit beeb460cd12ac9b91640b484b6a52dcba9d9fc8f upstream.
Currently after any algorithm is registered and tested, there's an
unnecessary request_module("cryptomgr") even if it's already loaded.
Also, CRYPTO_MSG_ALG_LOADED is sent twice, and thus if the algorithm is
"crct10dif", lib/crc-t10dif.c replaces the tfm twice rather than once.
This occurs because CRYPTO_MSG_ALG_LOADED is sent using
crypto_probing_notify(), which tries to load "cryptomgr" if the
notification is not handled (NOTIFY_DONE). This doesn't make sense
because "cryptomgr" doesn't handle this notification.
Fix this by using crypto_notify() instead of crypto_probing_notify().
Fixes: dd8b083f9a5e ("crypto: api - Introduce notifier for new crypto algorithms")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.20+
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1a263ae60b04de959d9ce9caea4889385eefcc7b upstream.
gcc-10 has started warning about conflicting types for a few new
built-in functions, particularly 'free()'.
This results in warnings like:
crypto/xts.c:325:13: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘free’; expected ‘void(void *)’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
because the crypto layer had its local freeing functions called
'free()'.
Gcc-10 is in the wrong here, since that function is marked 'static', and
thus there is no chance of confusion with any standard library function
namespace.
But the simplest thing to do is to just use a different name here, and
avoid this gcc mis-feature.
[ Side note: gcc knowing about 'free()' is in itself not the
mis-feature: the semantics of 'free()' are special enough that a
compiler can validly do special things when seeing it.
So the mis-feature here is that gcc thinks that 'free()' is some
restricted name, and you can't shadow it as a local static function.
Making the special 'free()' semantics be a function attribute rather
than tied to the name would be the much better model ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit eed74b3eba9eda36d155c11a12b2b4b50c67c1d8 upstream.
We need to decrement this refcounter on these error paths.
Fixes: f7d76e05d058 ("crypto: user - fix use_after_free of struct xxx_request")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wei Yongjun