commit b86dab054059b970111b5516ae548efaae5b3aae upstream.
When k_ascii is invoked several times in a row there is a potential for
signed integer overflow:
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:888:19 signed integer overflow:
10 * 1111111111 cannot be represented in type 'int'
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.6.11 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118
ubsan_epilogue+0xe/0x30 lib/ubsan.c:154
handle_overflow+0xdc/0xf0 lib/ubsan.c:184
__ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0x2a/0x40 lib/ubsan.c:205
k_ascii+0xbf/0xd0 drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:888
kbd_keycode drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:1477 [inline]
kbd_event+0x888/0x3be0 drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:1495
While it can be worked around by using check_mul_overflow()/
check_add_overflow(), it is better to introduce a separate flag to
signal that number pad is being used to compose a symbol, and
change type of the accumulator from signed to unsigned, thus
avoiding undefined behavior when it overflows.
Reported-by: Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200525232740.GA262061@dtor-ws
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 57d38f26d81e4275748b69372f31df545dcd9b71 ]
By directly using kfree() in different places we risk missing one if
it is switched to using vfree(), especially if the corresponding
vmalloc() is hidden away within a common abstraction.
Oh wait, that's exactly what happened here.
So let's fix this by creating a common abstraction for the free case
as well.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Reported-by: syzbot+0bfda3ade1ee9288a1be@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 9a98e7a80f95 ("vt: don't use kmalloc() for the unicode screen buffer")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YSQ.7.76.2005021043110.2671@knanqh.ubzr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 9a98e7a80f95378c9ee0c644705e3b5aa54745f1 upstream.
Even if the actual screen size is bounded in vc_do_resize(), the unicode
buffer is still a little more than twice the size of the glyph buffer
and may exceed MAX_ORDER down the kmalloc() path. This can be triggered
from user space.
Since there is no point having a physically contiguous buffer here,
let's avoid the above issue as well as reducing pressure on high order
allocations by using vmalloc() instead.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YSQ.7.76.2003282214210.2671@knanqh.ubzr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2717769e204e83e65b8819c5e2ef3e5b6639b270 upstream.
The code in vc_do_resize() bounds the memory allocation size to avoid
exceeding MAX_ORDER down the kzalloc() call chain and generating a
runtime warning triggerable from user space. However, not only is it
unwise to use a literal value here, but MAX_ORDER may also be
configurable based on CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER.
Let's use KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE instead.
Note that prior commit bb1107f7c605 ("mm, slab: make sure that
KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE will fit into MAX_ORDER") the KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE value
could not be relied upon.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YSQ.7.76.2003281702410.2671@knanqh.ubzr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Dmitry Torokhov