Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christian Borntraeger e220ccd4b5 KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
[ Upstream commit 774911290c589e98e3638e73b24b0a4d4530e97c ]

The current number of KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS results in an order 3
allocation (32kb) for each guest start/restart. This can result in OOM
killer activity even with free swap when the memory is fragmented
enough:

kernel: qemu-system-s39 invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x440dc0(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), order=3, oom_score_adj=0
kernel: CPU: 1 PID: 357274 Comm: qemu-system-s39 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.4.0-29-generic #33-Ubuntu
kernel: Hardware name: IBM 8562 T02 Z06 (LPAR)
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: ([<00000001f848fe2a>] show_stack+0x7a/0xc0)
kernel:  [<00000001f8d3437a>] dump_stack+0x8a/0xc0
kernel:  [<00000001f8687032>] dump_header+0x62/0x258
kernel:  [<00000001f8686122>] oom_kill_process+0x172/0x180
kernel:  [<00000001f8686abe>] out_of_memory+0xee/0x580
kernel:  [<00000001f86e66b8>] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0xd18/0xe90
kernel:  [<00000001f86e6ad4>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2a4/0x320
kernel:  [<00000001f86b1ab4>] kmalloc_order+0x34/0xb0
kernel:  [<00000001f86b1b62>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x32/0xe0
kernel:  [<00000001f84bb806>] kvm_set_irq_routing+0xa6/0x2e0
kernel:  [<00000001f84c99a4>] kvm_arch_vm_ioctl+0x544/0x9e0
kernel:  [<00000001f84b8936>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x396/0x760
kernel:  [<00000001f875df66>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x376/0x690
kernel:  [<00000001f875e304>] ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb0
kernel:  [<00000001f875e39a>] __s390x_sys_ioctl+0x2a/0x40
kernel:  [<00000001f8d55424>] system_call+0xd8/0x2c8

As far as I can tell s390x does not use the iopins as we bail our for
anything other than KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_S390_ADAPTER and the chip/pin is
only used for KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP. So let us use a small number to
reduce the memory footprint.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617083620.5409-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-16 16:31:23 +08:00
Vincenzo Frascino e504756a89 s390/vdso: fix vDSO clock_getres()
[ Upstream commit 478237a595120a18e9b52fd2c57a6e8b7a01e411 ]

clock_getres in the vDSO library has to preserve the same behaviour
of posix_get_hrtimer_res().

In particular, posix_get_hrtimer_res() does:
    sec = 0;
    ns = hrtimer_resolution;
and hrtimer_resolution depends on the enablement of the high
resolution timers that can happen either at compile or at run time.

Fix the s390 vdso implementation of clock_getres keeping a copy of
hrtimer_resolution in vdso data and using that directly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200324121027.21665-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
[heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com: use llgf for proper zero extension]
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-16 16:31:05 +08:00
Dmitry V. Levin 89d9282e47 s390: fix syscall_get_error for compat processes
commit b3583fca5fb654af2cfc1c08259abb9728272538 upstream.

If both the tracer and the tracee are compat processes, and gprs[2]
is assigned a value by __poke_user_compat, then the higher 32 bits
of gprs[2] are cleared, IS_ERR_VALUE() always returns false, and
syscall_get_error() always returns 0.

Fix the implementation by sign-extending the value for compat processes
the same way as x86 implementation does.

The bug was exposed to user space by commit 201766a20e30f ("ptrace: add
PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request") and detected by strace test suite.

This change fixes strace syscall tampering on s390.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200602180051.GA2427@altlinux.org
Fixes: 753c4dd6a2fa2 ("[S390] ptrace changes")
Cc: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.28+
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-16 16:30:42 +08:00
Niklas Schnelle 82e1781c34 s390/pci: Fix s390_mmio_read/write with MIO
commit f058599e22d59e594e5aae1dc10560568d8f4a8b upstream.

The s390_mmio_read/write syscalls are currently broken when running with
MIO.

The new pcistb_mio/pcstg_mio/pcilg_mio instructions are executed
similiarly to normal load/store instructions and do address translation
in the current address space. That means inside the kernel they are
aware of mappings into kernel address space while outside the kernel
they use user space mappings (usually created through mmap'ing a PCI
device file).

Now when existing user space applications use the s390_pci_mmio_write
and s390_pci_mmio_read syscalls, they pass I/O addresses that are mapped
into user space so as to be usable with the new instructions without
needing a syscall. Accessing these addresses with the old instructions
as done currently leads to a kernel panic.

Also, for such a user space mapping there may not exist an equivalent
kernel space mapping which means we can't just use the new instructions
in kernel space.

Instead of replicating user mappings in the kernel which then might
collide with other mappings, we can conceptually execute the new
instructions as if executed by the user space application using the
secondary address space. This even allows us to directly store to the
user pointer without the need for copy_to/from_user().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 71ba41c9b1d9 ("s390/pci: provide support for MIO instructions")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-16 16:28:19 +08:00
Kaixu Xia 590eaf1fec Init Repo base on linux 5.4.32 long term, and add base tlinux kernel interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
2021-03-16 11:01:34 +08:00