![]() Since we don't unique specializations for concepts, we can just instantiate them with the sugared template arguments, at negligible cost. If we don't track their specializations, we can't resugar them later anyway, and that would be more expensive than just instantiating them sugared in the first place since it would require an additional pass. Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136566 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
p1.cpp | ||
p2.cpp | ||
p3.cpp | ||
p4.cpp | ||
p5.cpp | ||
p7.cpp | ||
p8-cxx20.cpp | ||
p8.cpp | ||
p9-0x.cpp | ||
p9.cpp | ||
p10-0x.cpp | ||
p10-2a.cpp | ||
p10.cpp | ||
p11-0x.cpp | ||
p11.cpp | ||
p12.cpp | ||
p13.cpp | ||
p15-cxx0x.cpp | ||
p15.cpp |