forked from TencentOS/TencentOS-kernel
8 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Sven Schnelle
|
50798c4ccb |
seccomp: Add missing compat_ioctl for notify
commit 3db81afd99494a33f1c3839103f0429c8f30cb9d upstream.
Executing the seccomp_bpf testsuite under a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit
userland (both s390 and x86) doesn't work because there's no compat_ioctl
handler defined. Add the handler.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 6a21cc50f0c7 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310123332.42255-1-svens@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
Boqun Feng
|
2e9aadc93b |
locking/lockdep: Avoid recursion in lockdep_count_{for,back}ward_deps()
[ Upstream commit 25016bd7f4caf5fc983bbab7403d08e64cba3004 ] Qian Cai reported a bug when PROVE_RCU_LIST=y, and read on /proc/lockdep triggered a warning: [ ] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled) ... [ ] Call Trace: [ ] lock_is_held_type+0x5d/0x150 [ ] ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x64/0x80 [ ] rcu_read_lock_any_held+0xac/0x100 [ ] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0xc0/0xc0 [ ] ? __slab_free+0x421/0x540 [ ] ? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 [ ] ? __kmalloc_node+0x1d7/0x320 [ ] ? kvmalloc_node+0x6f/0x80 [ ] __bfs+0x28a/0x3c0 [ ] ? class_equal+0x30/0x30 [ ] lockdep_count_forward_deps+0x11a/0x1a0 The warning got triggered because lockdep_count_forward_deps() call __bfs() without current->lockdep_recursion being set, as a result a lockdep internal function (__bfs()) is checked by lockdep, which is unexpected, and the inconsistency between the irq-off state and the state traced by lockdep caused the warning. Apart from this warning, lockdep internal functions like __bfs() should always be protected by current->lockdep_recursion to avoid potential deadlocks and data inconsistency, therefore add the current->lockdep_recursion on-and-off section to protect __bfs() in both lockdep_count_forward_deps() and lockdep_count_backward_deps() Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312151258.128036-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
|
|
Alexander Sverdlin
|
62e515533b |
genirq/irqdomain: Check pointer in irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy()
[ Upstream commit 87f2d1c662fa1761359fdf558246f97e484d177a ] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy() has 3 call sites in the compilation unit but only one of them checks for the pointer which is being dereferenced inside the called function. Move the check into the function. This allows for catching the error instead of the following crash: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 PC is at 0x0 LR is at gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_alloc+0x11f/0x140 ... [<c06c23ff>] (gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_alloc) [<c0462a89>] (__irq_domain_alloc_irqs) [<c0462dad>] (irq_create_fwspec_mapping) [<c06c2251>] (gpiochip_to_irq) [<c06c1c9b>] (gpiod_to_irq) [<bf973073>] (gpio_irqs_init [gpio_irqs]) [<bf974048>] (gpio_irqs_exit+0xecc/0xe84 [gpio_irqs]) Code: bad PC value Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306174720.82604-1-alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
|
|
Michael Wang
|
bbbcbe519c |
sched: Avoid scale real weight down to zero
[ Upstream commit 26cf52229efc87e2effa9d788f9b33c40fb3358a ] During our testing, we found a case that shares no longer working correctly, the cgroup topology is like: /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A (shares=102400) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A/B (shares=2) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A/B/C (shares=1024) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D (shares=1024) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D/E (shares=1024) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D/E/F (shares=1024) The same benchmark is running in group C & F, no other tasks are running, the benchmark is capable to consumed all the CPUs. We suppose the group C will win more CPU resources since it could enjoy all the shares of group A, but it's F who wins much more. The reason is because we have group B with shares as 2, since A->cfs_rq.load.weight == B->se.load.weight == B->shares/nr_cpus, so A->cfs_rq.load.weight become very small. And in calc_group_shares() we calculate shares as: load = max(scale_load_down(cfs_rq->load.weight), cfs_rq->avg.load_avg); shares = (tg_shares * load) / tg_weight; Since the 'cfs_rq->load.weight' is too small, the load become 0 after scale down, although 'tg_shares' is 102400, shares of the se which stand for group A on root cfs_rq become 2. While the se of D on root cfs_rq is far more bigger than 2, so it wins the battle. Thus when scale_load_down() scale real weight down to 0, it's no longer telling the real story, the caller will have the wrong information and the calculation will be buggy. This patch add check in scale_load_down(), so the real weight will be >= MIN_SHARES after scale, after applied the group C wins as expected. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/38e8e212-59a1-64b2-b247-b6d0b52d8dc1@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
|
|
Ahmed S. Darwish
|
78f649253b |
time/sched_clock: Expire timer in hardirq context
[ Upstream commit 2c8bd58812ee3dbf0d78b566822f7eacd34bdd7b ] To minimize latency, PREEMPT_RT kernels expires hrtimers in preemptible softirq context by default. This can be overriden by marking the timer's expiry with HRTIMER_MODE_HARD. sched_clock_timer is missing this annotation: if its callback is preempted and the duration of the preemption exceeds the wrap around time of the underlying clocksource, sched clock will get out of sync. Mark the sched_clock_timer for expiry in hard interrupt context. Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200309181529.26558-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
|
|
Thomas Hellstrom
|
c06f49c7b8 |
dma-mapping: Fix dma_pgprot() for unencrypted coherent pages
[ Upstream commit 17c4a2ae15a7aaefe84bdb271952678c5c9cd8e1 ] When dma_mmap_coherent() sets up a mapping to unencrypted coherent memory under SEV encryption and sometimes under SME encryption, it will actually set up an encrypted mapping rather than an unencrypted, causing devices that DMAs from that memory to read encrypted contents. Fix this. When force_dma_unencrypted() returns true, the linear kernel map of the coherent pages have had the encryption bit explicitly cleared and the page content is unencrypted. Make sure that any additional PTEs we set up to these pages also have the encryption bit cleared by having dma_pgprot() return a protection with the encryption bit cleared in this case. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200304114527.3636-3-thomas_os@shipmail.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
|
|
Yonghong Song
|
fe540972b9 |
bpf: Fix deadlock with rq_lock in bpf_send_signal()
[ Upstream commit 1bc7896e9ef44fd77858b3ef0b8a6840be3a4494 ] When experimenting with bpf_send_signal() helper in our production environment (5.2 based), we experienced a deadlock in NMI mode: #5 [ffffc9002219f770] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff8110be24 #6 [ffffc9002219f770] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff81a43012 #7 [ffffc9002219f780] try_to_wake_up at ffffffff810e7ecd #8 [ffffc9002219f7e0] signal_wake_up_state at ffffffff810c7b55 #9 [ffffc9002219f7f0] __send_signal at ffffffff810c8602 #10 [ffffc9002219f830] do_send_sig_info at ffffffff810ca31a #11 [ffffc9002219f868] bpf_send_signal at ffffffff8119d227 #12 [ffffc9002219f988] bpf_overflow_handler at ffffffff811d4140 #13 [ffffc9002219f9e0] __perf_event_overflow at ffffffff811d68cf #14 [ffffc9002219fa10] perf_swevent_overflow at ffffffff811d6a09 #15 [ffffc9002219fa38] ___perf_sw_event at ffffffff811e0f47 #16 [ffffc9002219fc30] __schedule at ffffffff81a3e04d #17 [ffffc9002219fc90] schedule at ffffffff81a3e219 #18 [ffffc9002219fca0] futex_wait_queue_me at ffffffff8113d1b9 #19 [ffffc9002219fcd8] futex_wait at ffffffff8113e529 #20 [ffffc9002219fdf0] do_futex at ffffffff8113ffbc #21 [ffffc9002219fec0] __x64_sys_futex at ffffffff81140d1c #22 [ffffc9002219ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81002602 #23 [ffffc9002219ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81c00068 The above call stack is actually very similar to an issue reported by Commit eac9153f2b58 ("bpf/stackmap: Fix deadlock with rq_lock in bpf_get_stack()") by Song Liu. The only difference is bpf_send_signal() helper instead of bpf_get_stack() helper. The above deadlock is triggered with a perf_sw_event. Similar to Commit eac9153f2b58, the below almost identical reproducer used tracepoint point sched/sched_switch so the issue can be easily caught. /* stress_test.c */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #define THREAD_COUNT 1000 char *filename; void *worker(void *p) { void *ptr; int fd; char *pptr; fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY); if (fd < 0) return NULL; while (1) { struct timespec ts = {0, 1000 + rand() % 2000}; ptr = mmap(NULL, 4096 * 64, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0); usleep(1); if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) { printf("failed to mmap\n"); break; } munmap(ptr, 4096 * 64); usleep(1); pptr = malloc(1); usleep(1); pptr[0] = 1; usleep(1); free(pptr); usleep(1); nanosleep(&ts, NULL); } close(fd); return NULL; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { void *ptr; int i; pthread_t threads[THREAD_COUNT]; if (argc < 2) return 0; filename = argv[1]; for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) { if (pthread_create(threads + i, NULL, worker, NULL)) { fprintf(stderr, "Error creating thread\n"); return 0; } } for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) pthread_join(threads[i], NULL); return 0; } and the following command: 1. run `stress_test /bin/ls` in one windown 2. hack bcc trace.py with the following change: # --- a/tools/trace.py # +++ b/tools/trace.py @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ BPF_PERF_OUTPUT(%s); __data.tgid = __tgid; __data.pid = __pid; bpf_get_current_comm(&__data.comm, sizeof(__data.comm)); + bpf_send_signal(10); %s %s %s.perf_submit(%s, &__data, sizeof(__data)); 3. in a different window run ./trace.py -p $(pidof stress_test) t:sched:sched_switch The deadlock can be reproduced in our production system. Similar to Song's fix, the fix is to delay sending signal if irqs is disabled to avoid deadlocks involving with rq_lock. With this change, my above stress-test in our production system won't cause deadlock any more. I also implemented a scale-down version of reproducer in the selftest (a subsequent commit). With latest bpf-next, it complains for the following potential deadlock. [ 32.832450] -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 32.833100] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x80 [ 32.833696] task_rq_lock+0x2c/0xa0 [ 32.834182] task_sched_runtime+0x59/0xd0 [ 32.834721] thread_group_cputime+0x250/0x270 [ 32.835304] thread_group_cputime_adjusted+0x2e/0x70 [ 32.835959] do_task_stat+0x8a7/0xb80 [ 32.836461] proc_single_show+0x51/0xb0 ... [ 32.839512] -> #0 (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){....}: [ 32.840275] __lock_acquire+0x1358/0x1a20 [ 32.840826] lock_acquire+0xc7/0x1d0 [ 32.841309] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x80 [ 32.841916] __lock_task_sighand+0x79/0x160 [ 32.842465] do_send_sig_info+0x35/0x90 [ 32.842977] bpf_send_signal+0xa/0x10 [ 32.843464] bpf_prog_bc13ed9e4d3163e3_send_signal_tp_sched+0x465/0x1000 [ 32.844301] trace_call_bpf+0x115/0x270 [ 32.844809] perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0x4a/0xc0 [ 32.845411] perf_trace_sched_switch+0x10f/0x180 [ 32.846014] __schedule+0x45d/0x880 [ 32.846483] schedule+0x5f/0xd0 ... [ 32.853148] Chain exists of: [ 32.853148] &(&sighand->siglock)->rlock --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock [ 32.853148] [ 32.854451] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 32.854451] [ 32.855173] CPU0 CPU1 [ 32.855745] ---- ---- [ 32.856278] lock(&rq->lock); [ 32.856671] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 32.857332] lock(&rq->lock); [ 32.857999] lock(&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock); Deadlock happens on CPU0 when it tries to acquire &sighand->siglock but it has been held by CPU1 and CPU1 tries to grab &rq->lock and cannot get it. This is not exactly the callstack in our production environment, but sympotom is similar and both locks are using spin_lock_irqsave() to acquire the lock, and both involves rq_lock. The fix to delay sending signal when irq is disabled also fixed this issue. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200304191104.2796501-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|
|
Kaixu Xia
|
590eaf1fec |
Init Repo base on linux 5.4.32 long term, and add base tlinux kernel interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com> |