[ Upstream commit fd844ba9ae59b51e34e77105d79f8eca780b3bd6 ]
This function is concerned with the long-term CPU mask, not the
transitory mask the task might have while migrate disabled. Before
this patch, if a task was migrate-disabled at the time
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr() was called, and the new mask happened to be
equal to the CPU that the task was running on, then the mask update
would be lost.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200617121742.cpxppyi7twxmpin7@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 740797ce3a124b7dd22b7fb832d87bc8fba1cf6f ]
syzbot reported the following warning:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6351 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:628
enqueue_task_dl+0x22da/0x38a0 kernel/sched/deadline.c:1504
At deadline.c:628 we have:
623 static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
624 {
625 struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
626 struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
627
628 WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_boosted);
629 WARN_ON(dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_se->deadline));
[...]
}
Which means that setup_new_dl_entity() has been called on a task
currently boosted. This shouldn't happen though, as setup_new_dl_entity()
is only called when the 'dynamic' deadline of the new entity
is in the past w.r.t. rq_clock and boosted tasks shouldn't verify this
condition.
Digging through the PI code I noticed that what above might in fact happen
if an RT tasks blocks on an rt_mutex hold by a DEADLINE task. In the
first branch of boosting conditions we check only if a pi_task 'dynamic'
deadline is earlier than mutex holder's and in this case we set mutex
holder to be dl_boosted. However, since RT 'dynamic' deadlines are only
initialized if such tasks get boosted at some point (or if they become
DEADLINE of course), in general RT 'dynamic' deadlines are usually equal
to 0 and this verifies the aforementioned condition.
Fix it by checking that the potential donor task is actually (even if
temporary because in turn boosted) running at DEADLINE priority before
using its 'dynamic' deadline value.
Fixes: 2d3d891d3344 ("sched/deadline: Add SCHED_DEADLINE inheritance logic")
Reported-by: syzbot+119ba87189432ead09b4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181119153201.GB2119@localhost.localdomain
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d505b8af58912ae1e1a211fabc9995b19bd40828 ]
When users write some huge number into cpu.cfs_quota_us or
cpu.rt_runtime_us, overflow might happen during to_ratio() shifts of
schedulable checks.
to_ratio() could be altered to avoid unnecessary internal overflow, but
min_cfs_quota_period is less than 1 << BW_SHIFT, so a cutoff would still
be needed. Set a cap MAX_BW for cfs_quota_us and rt_runtime_us to
prevent overflow.
Signed-off-by: Huaixin Chang <changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200425105248.60093-1-changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bf2c59fce4074e55d622089b34be3a6bc95484fb ]
In the CPU-offline process, it calls mmdrop() after idle entry and the
subsequent call to cpuhp_report_idle_dead(). Once execution passes the
call to rcu_report_dead(), RCU is ignoring the CPU, which results in
lockdep complaining when mmdrop() uses RCU from either memcg or
debugobjects below.
Fix it by cleaning up the active_mm state from BP instead. Every arch
which has CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU should have already called idle_task_exit()
from AP. The only exception is parisc because it switches them to
&init_mm unconditionally (see smp_boot_one_cpu() and smp_cpu_init()),
but the patch will still work there because it calls mmgrab(&init_mm) in
smp_cpu_init() and then should call mmdrop(&init_mm) in finish_cpu().
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
-----------------------------
kernel/workqueue.c:710 RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xf4/0x164 (unreliable)
lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x140/0x164
get_work_pool+0x110/0x150
__queue_work+0x1bc/0xca0
queue_work_on+0x114/0x120
css_release+0x9c/0xc0
percpu_ref_put_many+0x204/0x230
free_pcp_prepare+0x264/0x570
free_unref_page+0x38/0xf0
__mmdrop+0x21c/0x2c0
idle_task_exit+0x170/0x1b0
pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self+0x38/0x2e0
cpu_die+0x48/0x64
arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x30/0x50
do_idle+0x2f4/0x470
cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x40
start_secondary+0x7a8/0xa80
start_secondary_resume+0x10/0x14
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200401214033.8448-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit eaf5a92ebde5bca3bb2565616115bd6d579486cd upstream.
uclamp_fork() resets the uclamp values to their default when the
reset-on-fork flag is set. It also checks whether the task has a RT
policy, and sets its uclamp.min to 1024 accordingly. However, during
reset-on-fork, the task's policy is lowered to SCHED_NORMAL right after,
hence leading to an erroneous uclamp.min setting for the new task if it
was forked from RT.
Fix this by removing the unnecessary check on rt_task() in
uclamp_fork() as this doesn't make sense if the reset-on-fork flag is
set.
Fixes: 1a00d999971c ("sched/uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks")
Reported-by: Chitti Babu Theegala <ctheegal@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416085956.217587-1-qperret@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Scott Wood