Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sudhakar Panneerselvam 90bdf18d66 scsi: vhost: Notify TCM about the maximum sg entries supported per command
[ Upstream commit 5ae6a6a915033bfee79e76e0c374d4f927909edc ]

vhost-scsi pre-allocates the maximum sg entries per command and if a
command requires more than VHOST_SCSI_PREALLOC_SGLS entries, then that
command is failed by it. This patch lets vhost communicate the max sg limit
when it registers vhost_scsi_ops with TCM. With this change, TCM would
report the max sg entries through "Block Limits" VPD page which will be
typically queried by the SCSI initiator during device discovery. By knowing
this limit, the initiator could ensure the maximum transfer length is less
than or equal to what is reported by vhost-scsi.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1590166317-953-1-git-send-email-sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Panneerselvam <sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-16 16:30:04 +08:00
Stefano Garzarella 6f3c2fa3f1 vhost/vsock: fix packet delivery order to monitoring devices
[ Upstream commit 107bc0766b9feb5113074c753735a3f115c2141f ]

We want to deliver packets to monitoring devices before it is
put in the virtqueue, to avoid that replies can appear in the
packet capture before the transmitted packet.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-16 16:28:09 +08:00
Jia He ce111ce781 vhost: vsock: kick send_pkt worker once device is started
commit 0b841030625cde5f784dd62aec72d6a766faae70 upstream.

Ning Bo reported an abnormal 2-second gap when booting Kata container [1].
The unconditional timeout was caused by VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT of
connecting from the client side. The vhost vsock client tries to connect
an initializing virtio vsock server.

The abnormal flow looks like:
host-userspace           vhost vsock                       guest vsock
==============           ===========                       ============
connect()     -------->  vhost_transport_send_pkt_work()   initializing
   |                     vq->private_data==NULL
   |                     will not be queued
   V
schedule_timeout(2s)
                         vhost_vsock_start()  <---------   device ready
                         set vq->private_data

wait for 2s and failed
connect() again          vq->private_data!=NULL         recv connecting pkt

Details:
1. Host userspace sends a connect pkt, at that time, guest vsock is under
   initializing, hence the vhost_vsock_start has not been called. So
   vq->private_data==NULL, and the pkt is not been queued to send to guest
2. Then it sleeps for 2s
3. After guest vsock finishes initializing, vq->private_data is set
4. When host userspace wakes up after 2s, send connecting pkt again,
   everything is fine.

As suggested by Stefano Garzarella, this fixes it by additional kicking the
send_pkt worker in vhost_vsock_start once the virtio device is started. This
makes the pending pkt sent again.

After this patch, kata-runtime (with vsock enabled) boot time is reduced
from 3s to 1s on a ThunderX2 arm64 server.

[1] https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/1917

Reported-by: Ning Bo <n.b@live.com>
Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200501043840.186557-1-justin.he@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-16 16:27:24 +08:00
Kaixu Xia 590eaf1fec Init Repo base on linux 5.4.32 long term, and add base tlinux kernel interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
2021-03-16 11:01:34 +08:00