commit ef3e40a7ea8dbe2abd0a345032cd7d5023b9684f upstream.
When using the PtrAuth feature in a guest, we need to save the host's
keys before allowing the guest to program them. For that, we dump
them in a per-CPU data structure (the so called host context).
But both call sites that do this are in preemptible context,
which may end up in disaster should the vcpu thread get preempted
before reentering the guest.
Instead, save the keys eagerly on each vcpu_load(). This has an
increased overhead, but is at least safe.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0370964dd3ff7d3d406f292cb443a927952cbd05 upstream.
On a VHE system, the EL1 state is left in the CPU most of the time,
and only syncronized back to memory when vcpu_put() is called (most
of the time on preemption).
Which means that when injecting an exception, we'd better have a way
to either:
(1) write directly to the EL1 sysregs
(2) synchronize the state back to memory, and do the changes there
For an AArch64, we already do (1), so we are safe. Unfortunately,
doing the same thing for AArch32 would be pretty invasive. Instead,
we can easily implement (2) by calling the put/load architectural
backends, and keep preemption disabled. We can then reload the
state back into EL1.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 71f8af1110101facfad68989ff91f88f8e2c3e22 ]
Tomas Paukrt reports that his SAM9X60 based system (ARM926, ARMv5TJ)
fails to fix up alignment faults, eventually resulting in a kernel
oops.
The problem occurs when using CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS with commit
e6978e4bf181 ("ARM: save and reset the address limit when entering an
exception"). This is because the address limit is set back to
TASK_SIZE on exception entry, and, although it is restored on exception
exit, the domain register is not.
Hence, this sequence can occur:
interrupt
pt_regs->addr_limit = addr_limit // USER_DS
addr_limit = USER_DS
alignment exception
__probe_kernel_read()
old_fs = get_fs() // USER_DS
set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
addr_limit = KERNEL_DS
dacr.kernel = DOMAIN_MANAGER
interrupt
pt_regs->addr_limit = addr_limit // KERNEL_DS
addr_limit = USER_DS
alignment exception
__probe_kernel_read()
old_fs = get_fs() // USER_DS
set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
addr_limit = KERNEL_DS
dacr.kernel = DOMAIN_MANAGER
...
set_fs(old_fs)
addr_limit = USER_DS
dacr.kernel = DOMAIN_CLIENT
...
addr_limit = pt_regs->addr_limit // KERNEL_DS
interrupt returns
At this point, addr_limit is correctly restored to KERNEL_DS for
__probe_kernel_read() to continue execution, but dacr.kernel is not,
it has been reset by the set_fs(old_fs) to DOMAIN_CLIENT.
This would not have happened prior to the mentioned commit, because
addr_limit would remain KERNEL_DS, so get_fs() would have returned
KERNEL_DS, and so would correctly nest.
This commit fixes the problem by also saving the DACR on exception
entry if either CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN or CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS are
enabled, and resetting the DACR appropriately on exception entry to
match addr_limit and PAN settings.
Fixes: e6978e4bf181 ("ARM: save and reset the address limit when entering an exception")
Reported-by: Tomas Paukrt <tomas.paukrt@advantech.cz>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 747ffc2fcf969eff9309d7f2d1d61cb8b9e1bb40 ]
Consolidate the user access assembly code to asm/uaccess-asm.h. This
moves the csdb, check_uaccess, uaccess_mask_range_ptr, uaccess_enable,
uaccess_disable, uaccess_save, uaccess_restore macros, and creates two
new ones for exception entry and exit - uaccess_entry and uaccess_exit.
This makes the uaccess_save and uaccess_restore macros private to
asm/uaccess-asm.h.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8101b5a1531f3390b3a69fa7934c70a8fd6566ad ]
Stephen reported the following build warning on a ARM multi_v7_defconfig
build with GCC 9.2.1:
kernel/futex.c: In function 'do_futex':
kernel/futex.c:1676:17: warning: 'oldval' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
1676 | return oldval == cmparg;
| ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
kernel/futex.c:1652:6: note: 'oldval' was declared here
1652 | int oldval, ret;
| ^~~~~~
introduced by commit a08971e9488d ("futex: arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser()
calling conventions change").
While that change should not make any difference it confuses GCC which
fails to work out that oldval is not referenced when the return value is
not zero.
GCC fails to properly analyze arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(). It's not the
early return, the issue is with the assembly macros. GCC fails to detect
that those either set 'ret' to 0 and set oldval or set 'ret' to -EFAULT
which makes oldval uninteresting. The store to the callsite supplied oldval
pointer is conditional on ret == 0.
The straight forward way to solve this is to make the store unconditional.
Aside of addressing the build warning this makes sense anyway because it
removes the conditional from the fastpath. In the error case the stored
value is uninteresting and the extra store does not matter at all.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87pncao2ph.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Marc Zyngier