[ Upstream commit afbc293add6466f8f3f0c3d944d85f53709c170f ]
xfrm_probe_algs() probes kernel crypto modules and changes the
availability of struct xfrm_algo_desc. But there is a small window
where ealg->available and aalg->available get changed between
count_ah_combs()/count_esp_combs() and dump_ah_combs()/dump_esp_combs(),
in this case we may allocate a smaller skb but later put a larger
amount of data and trigger the panic in skb_put().
Fix this by relaxing the checks when counting the size, that is,
skipping the test of ->available. We may waste some memory for a few
of sizeof(struct sadb_comb), but it is still much better than a panic.
Reported-by: syzbot+b2bf2652983d23734c5c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 37bd22420f856fcd976989f1d4f1f7ad28e1fcac upstream.
In pfkey_dump() dplen and splen can both be specified to access the
xfrm_address_t structure out of bounds in__xfrm_state_filter_match()
when it calls addr_match() with the indexes. Return EINVAL if either
are out of range.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 4f47e8ab6ab796b5380f74866fa5287aca4dcc58 ]
In commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
it would take 'priority' to make a policy unique, and allow duplicated
policies with different 'priority' to be added, which is not expected
by userland, as Tobias reported in strongswan.
To fix this duplicated policies issue, and also fix the issue in
commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
when doing add/del/get/update on user interfaces, this patch is to change
to look up a policy with both mark and mask by doing:
mark.v == pol->mark.v && mark.m == pol->mark.m
and leave the check:
(mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v
for tx/rx path only.
As the userland expects an exact mark and mask match to manage policies.
v1->v2:
- make xfrm_policy_mark_match inline and fix the changelog as
Tobias suggested.
Fixes: 295fae568885 ("xfrm: Allow user space manipulation of SPD mark")
Fixes: ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list")
Reported-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Tested-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cong Wang