Test for two scenarios:
* When the fmod_ret program returns 0, the original function should
be called along with fentry and fexit programs.
* When the fmod_ret program returns a non-zero value, the original
function should not be called, no side effect should be observed and
fentry and fexit programs should be called.
The result from the kernel function call and whether a side-effect is
observed is returned via the retval attr of the BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN (bpf)
syscall.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200304191853.1529-8-kpsingh@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
[upstream commit faeb2dce084aff92d466c6ce68481989b815435b]
Add few kernel functions with various number of arguments,
their types and sizes for BPF trampoline testing to cover
different calling conventions.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191114185720.1641606-9-ast@kernel.org
[upstream commit f23c4b3924d2e9382820ee677b68d42d5dd7b08b]
In order to properly exercise the BPF dispatcher, this commit adds BPF
dispatcher usage to BPF_TEST_RUN when executing XDP programs.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191213175112.30208-5-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
Menglong Dong