SLI is used for cgroup performance monitoring, but it is not
necessary for some cases(such as running the linux without
cgroups on the embedded device). Therefor we add this
configuration to decide whether package SLI into kernel or not.
Signed-off-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
[upstream commit fc611f47f2188ade2b48ff6902d5cce8baac0c58]
Introduce types and configs for bpf programs that can be attached to
LSM hooks. The programs can be enabled by the config option
CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200329004356.27286-2-kpsingh@chromium.org
eBPF is not supported by cgroup-v1, because v1 can have multi
hierarchy, and it's not sure which one can be use.
To make v1 support eBPF, all eBPF program is attached to cgrp_dfl_root,
which means that there is only one attach point.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
commit ea29b20a828511de3348334e529a3d046a180416 upstream.
I read the commit log of the following two:
- bc083a64b6c0 ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML")
- 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390")
Both are talking about HAS_IOMEM dependency missing in many drivers.
So, 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' seems the direct, sensible solution to me.
This does not change the behavior of UML. UML still cannot enable
COMPILE_TEST because it does not provide HAS_IOMEM.
The current dependency for S390 is too strong. Under the condition of
CONFIG_PCI=y, S390 provides HAS_IOMEM, hence can enable COMPILE_TEST.
I also removed the meaningless 'default n'.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210224140809.1067582-1-masahiroy@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 334ef6ed06fa1a54e35296b77b693bcf6d63ee9e upstream.
While allmodconfig and allyesconfig build for s390 there are also
various bots running compile tests with randconfig, where PCI is
disabled. This reveals that a lot of drivers should actually depend on
HAS_IOMEM.
Adding this to each device driver would be a never ending story,
therefore just disable COMPILE_TEST for s390.
The reasoning is more or less the same as described in
commit bc083a64b6c0 ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML").
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 550c10d28d21bd82a8bb48debbb27e6ed53262f6 ]
The .bss section for the h8300 is relatively small. A value of
CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT that is larger than 19 will create a static
printk ringbuffer that is too large. Limit the range appropriately
for the H8300.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200812073122.25412-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 78a5255ffb6a1af189a83e493d916ba1c54d8c75 upstream.
We have some rather random rules about when we accept the
"maybe-initialized" warnings, and when we don't.
For example, we consider it unreliable for gcc versions < 4.9, but also
if -O3 is enabled, or if optimizing for size. And then various kernel
config options disabled it, because they know that they trigger that
warning by confusing gcc sufficiently (ie PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES).
And now gcc-10 seems to be introducing a lot of those warnings too, so
it falls under the same heading as 4.9 did.
At the same time, we have a very straightforward way to _enable_ that
warning when wanted: use "W=2" to enable more warnings.
So stop playing these ad-hoc games, and just disable that warning by
default, with the known and straight-forward "if you want to work on the
extra compiler warnings, use W=123".
Would it be great to have code that is always so obvious that it never
confuses the compiler whether a variable is used initialized or not?
Yes, it would. In a perfect world, the compilers would be smarter, and
our source code would be simpler.
That's currently not the world we live in, though.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
frankjpliu