From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/30/53
Link: 8cb8686864
Make the functions reserve_crashkernel[_low]() as generic.
Arm64 will use these to reimplement crashkernel=X.
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/30/53
Link: 8ec4a816f2
We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the
xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to
x86, the same as insert_resource() in reserve_crashkernel[_low]().
So move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch()
to keep them in x86.
Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/30/53
Link: 8882ba540e
The lower bounds of crash kernel reservation and crash kernel low
reservation are different, use the consistent value CRASH_ALIGN.
Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/30/53
Link: 873384fe79
Move CRASH_ALIGN to header asm/kexec.h for later use. Besides, the
alignment of crash kernel regions in x86 is 16M(CRASH_ALIGN), but
function reserve_crashkernel() also used 1M alignment. So just
replace hard-coded alignment 1M with macro CRASH_ALIGN.
Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
commit 6998a8800d73116187aad542391ce3b2dd0f9e30 upstream.
Commit 1a1c130ab757 ("ACPI: tables: x86: Reserve memory occupied by
ACPI tables") attempted to address an issue with reserving the memory
occupied by ACPI tables, but it broke the initrd-based table override
mechanism relied on by multiple users.
To restore the initrd-based ACPI table override functionality, move
the acpi_boot_table_init() invocation in setup_arch() on x86 after
the acpi_table_upgrade() one.
Fixes: 1a1c130ab757 ("ACPI: tables: x86: Reserve memory occupied by ACPI tables")
Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1a1c130ab7575498eed5bcf7220037ae09cd1f8a upstream.
The following problem has been reported by George Kennedy:
Since commit 7fef431be9c9 ("mm/page_alloc: place pages to tail
in __free_pages_core()") the following use after free occurs
intermittently when ACPI tables are accessed.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ibft_init+0x134/0xc49
Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880be453004 by task swapper/0/1
CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-7a7fd0d #1
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xf6/0x158
print_address_description.constprop.9+0x41/0x60
kasan_report.cold.14+0x7b/0xd4
__asan_report_load_n_noabort+0xf/0x20
ibft_init+0x134/0xc49
do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x3e0
kernel_init_freeable+0x5af/0x66b
kernel_init+0x16/0x1d0
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
ACPI tables mapped via kmap() do not have their mapped pages
reserved and the pages can be "stolen" by the buddy allocator.
Apparently, on the affected system, the ACPI table in question is
not located in "reserved" memory, like ACPI NVS or ACPI Data, that
will not be used by the buddy allocator, so the memory occupied by
that table has to be explicitly reserved to prevent the buddy
allocator from using it.
In order to address this problem, rearrange the initialization of the
ACPI tables on x86 to locate the initial tables earlier and reserve
the memory occupied by them.
The other architectures using ACPI should not be affected by this
change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1614802160-29362-1-git-send-email-george.kennedy@oracle.com/
Reported-by: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@oracle.com>
Tested-by: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: 5.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Kairui Song